Overview
Below are the details for the assignment, I will provide you with my login to capsim as well. Once ur done with the first paper I will provide you with the peer evaluation that you can write the next part on. Pls lmk if u need anything else.
Assignment Requirements:
Students will be asked to complete a scenario based project assuming the role of top management of a company. Using either a computer simulation, a case reading, or a real-world scenario, students will encounter a range of strategic issues that will require them to integrate knowledge from various business functions (i.e., accounting, finance, marketing, management, and information systems) to make a sound business decision. In doing so students will analyze and integrate numerous business and industry issues associated with the scenario and take into account the various perspectives of stakeholders involved before generating alternative solutions to the scenario and then choosing the optimal alternative. For the scenario provided, submit a well-written, typed, 5-7 page, double-spaced essay (which will be scored for written communication) that carefully addresses each the following 5 questions:
1. Decision Alternatives. What do you see as plausible decision alternatives to the business scenario you have been provided? Describe at least three alternatives; each should be discussed in detail and address different stakeholder perspectives. 2. Implications of Decision Alternatives. What would be the implications of each decision alternative? Describe any ethical implications associated with each of the decision alternatives. 3. Recommendation. What should the strategy be so that the company is best positioned under each decision alternative? In other words, which decision alternative do you recommend and why? 4. Functional Implications. As implications of your recommended decision, what are the actions needed in the next year for each function in the company: Marketing, Finance, Human Resource, Technology, Operations, etc.?
Formatting of Project
Your Scenario Based Strategic Management Project must be at least 5-7 pages, well-written, typed, and double spaced (Times New Roman font size 12 with 1 inch margins). You should also include a title page and table of contents which does NOT count towards the page requirements of the report. Large amounts of copied or quoted material, project guideline questions, and adjusting settings in Word (like line spacing, margins, font size, word spacing, etc.) will also not count towards meeting the page requirements. You should use 4 bolded 2 to 4 word headings from the above guidelines to clearly delineate the different sections of your Project.
Reflection Paper and Feedback After completion of your Scenario Based Strategic Management Project, you will discuss and get feedback on your report from a peer or group of your peers. This peer or peer group may be identified by the instructor or the instructor may ask you to choose your own peer or peer group. The feedback you receive should be meaningful and relate to the actual content of the report (versus grammar, punctuation, and other style-related issues). You will then be required to submit a reflection paper on what you would do differently based on the feedback. In this reflection paper, you will clearly document the questions/comments received and how you might consider changes in your report based on that feedback. Reflecting on the feedback you receive is NOT an optional part of the project. Your reflection paper should be 2 pages double spaced in length and be included as an appendix in the back of your Scenario Based Strategic Management Project.
View RubricGEB4890 Scenario Project
| Criteria | Ratings | Points |
Outcome: Problem Solving: (SLO#7) (Goal 1, LO2)Problem Solving: (SLO#7) (Goal 1, LO2) Problem Solving: (SLO#7) (Goal 1, LO2) view longer description Threshold: 1 pts | Exceeds Expectations: Student demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement and to identify multiple approaches to sove a problem that indicate insightfu comprehension of the problem and carefully addresses multiple contextual factors and thoroughly reviews results relative to the problem with specific consideration of need for further work. 2 pts Meets expectations: Student demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, proposes multiple solutions that suggest comprehension of the problem, some of which apply within a specific context and reviews results relative to the problem with some consideration of need for further work. 1 pts Does not meet expectations: Student demonstrates a limited ability to identify a problem statement and aporoaches for solvingthe problem, provides vague and cursory solutions that do not directly address a problem and reviews results superficially with no consideration of need for further work. 0 pts | /2 pts |
Outcome: Critical Thinking (SLO#6) (Goal 2 LO1)Critical Thinking (SLO#6) (Goal 2 LO1) Critical Thinking (SLO#6) (Goal 2 LO1) view longer description Threshold: 1 pts | Exceeds expectations: Student identifies and states problems clearly and completely in understable terms, carefully and comprehensivley evaluates the relevance of assumptions and questions the viewpoints of experts when presenting a positionm and formulaes conclusions based on a thorough and logical thought process that reflects careful analysis of appropriate assumptions and evidence 2 pts Meets Expectations: Student identifies problems to be considered critically with some omissions or lack of clarity, gathers mostly appropriate information to develop coherent arguments and questions some conventional assumptions and often considers opposing viewpoints when formulating conclusions. 1 pts Does not meet expectations: Student demonstrates some awareness of assumptions when identifyng positions, states problems in simple terms without much clarification, generally accepts viewpoints of experts as fact without questions, and routinely reaches conclusions not consistently tied to some of the available information. 0 pts | /2 pts |
Outcome: Interpersonal Communication Skills (SLO#3) (Goal 3, LO3)Interpersonal Communication Skills (SLO#3) (Goal 3, LO3) Interpersonal Communication Skills (SLO#3) (Goal 3, LO3) view longer description Threshold: 1 pts | Exceeds expectations: Student identifies and states problems clearly and completely in understable terms, carefully and comprehensivley evaluates the relevance of assumptions and questions the viewpoints of experts when presenting a positionm and formulaes conclusions based on a thorough and logical thought process that reflects careful analysis of appropriate assumptions and evidence. 2 pts Meets Expectations: Student identifies problems to be considered critically with some omissions or lack of clarity, gathers mostly appropriate information to develop coherent arguments and questions some conventional assumptions and often considers opposing viewpoints when formulating conclusions. 1 pts Does not meet expectations: Student demonstrates some awareness of assumptions when identifyng positions, states problems in simple terms without much clarification, generally accepts viewpoints of experts as fact without questions, and routinely reaches conclusions not consistently tied to some of the available information. 0 pts | /2 pts |
Choose a submission type
Submission type Upload, currently selectedUploadSelect submission type Google DriveGoogle Drive
More submission optionsMore