Overview
1st assignment
Before posting your Primary Response, create an outline, write a draft based on this outline, check your work with Draft Coach, and edit and revise as necessary. Provide scholarly sources to support your discussion as appropriate. Your responses should be the product of your own critical thinking and deductive reasoning.
This discussion post on what constitutes a strong literature review should focus on a reflective perspective regarding a self-analysis through a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis surrounding the compilation of the literature review. A candid self-evaluation should yield some interesting perspectives and aid in future growth in this vital area.
Focus on the following:
- What are your views on a strong literature review?
- Conduct a SWOT analysis on the annotated bibliography that you developed in RSCH860 and built upon in core and concentration courses.
- Develop a specific strategy for identifying a total of at least 60–80 relevant literature sources that will be included in your literature review.
- Discuss how you will convert your annotated bibliography and the work that you have done so far into a full blown literature review.
Assignment 1
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
2nd assignment
Based upon the following articles available in the CTU Library and your reading, address this unit's discussion. My login information to get to the library is username santayna.folkes Password Mommyme77!I also attached an assignment with my organization for idea from a previous assignment please remember to NOT just used the CTU sources also used additional sources too.
Go to the CTU Library and open the ABI Inform database. Find and review the following articles:
- Papastephanou, M. (2010). Aristotle, the Action Researcher.Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44(4), 589–595.
- Postholm, M. B., & Skrøvset, S. (2013). The researcher reflecting on her own role during action research. Educational Action Research, 21(4), 506–518.
- Shah, H., Eardley, A., & Wood-Harper, T. (2007). ALTAR: Achieving learning through action research. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000720
What behaviors will you need to employ to bring this principle to life during your organization's project? Why?
Why is self as an instrument for change such an important part of the work?
How do single- and double-loop learning connect to action research? Why is this important or not important?