Overview
To review the assignment information below, click on the document name to view or download the document. Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.
Decision-Making Assignment InstructionsDownload Decision-Making Assignment Instructions
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. For more information about Turnitin, click hereLinks to an external site..
LUO Submission Policy
The first submission of this assignment will be used for grading. If you need an exception to this policy, please contact your faculty member.
Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module 4: Week 4.
| Decision-Making Grading RubricDownload | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Among the Given Techniques Compare 2 Decision-Making Techniques | 20 to >14 pts Advanced Thoroughly compared 2 decision-making techniques14 to >8 pts Proficient Satisfactorily compared 2 decision-making techniques8 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently compared 2 decision-making techniques0 pts Not Present Did not provide 2 decision-making technique or compare them. | / 20 pts |
Presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique. | 10 to >8 pts Advanced Thoroughly presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.8 to >5 pts Proficient Satisfactorily presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.5 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently presented a problem to be solved using a decision making technique.0 pts Not Present Did not present a problem to be solved using a decision making technique. | / 10 pts |
Apply the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail. | 20 to >14 pts Advanced Thoroughly applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.14 to >8 pts Proficient Satisfactorily applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.8 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently applied the decision-making technique to solve the problem in detail.0 pts Not Present Did not apply the technique. | / 20 pts |
State what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making | 5 to >3 pts Advanced Thoroughly stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.3 to >1 pts Proficient Satisfactorily stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.1 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently stated what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making.0 pts Not Present Did not state what the Bible or Christian literature says about decision-making. | / 5 pts |
Abstract | 5 to >3 pts Advanced Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.3 to >1 pts Proficient Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.1 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient.0 pts Not Present Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application. | / 5 pts |
Introduction | 5 to >3 pts Advanced Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.3 to >1 pts Proficient Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.1 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from your introduction section.0 pts Not Present Did not present a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A thesis statement is missing from your introduction section. | / 5 pts |
Conclusion | 5 to >3 pts Advanced Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.3 to >1 pts Proficient Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.1 to >0 pts Developing Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.0 pts Not Present Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction. | / 5 pts |
Mechanics, Composition & Word Count | 10 to >8 pts Advanced Mechanics, composition, and word count is thorough.8 to >5 pts Proficient Mechanics, composition, and word count is satisfactory.5 to >0 pts Developing Mechanics, composition, and word count is insufficient.0 pts Not Present There are many errors in mechanics, composition, and word count. | / 10 pts |
APA Formatting | 5 to >3 pts Advanced APA formatting is thorough.3 to >1 pts Proficient APA formatting is satisfactory.1 to >0 pts Developing APA formatting is insufficient.0 pts Not Present APA formatting does not exist. | / 5 pts |
References | 5 to >3 pts Advanced References meet requirements in number and quality.3 to >1 pts Proficient References almost meet requirements in number and quality.1 to >0 pts Developing References do not meet requirements in number and quality.0 pts Not Present Missing references | / 5 pts |
Citations | 10 to >8 pts Advanced All statements are supported by citations.8 to >5 pts Proficient Many statements are supported by citations.5 to >0 pts Developing Some statements are supported by citations.0 pts Not Present Citations are rare, repetitious, or non-existent. | / 10 pts |
| Total Points: 0 |