OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Management · Studypool

busn410 analyzing an editorial

ASSIGNMENT Prompt:

Choose an editorial article from within the past 3 years. An editorial is an article that presents the writer's opinion on an issue supported with facts. The article can be from a reputable source like the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or an academic editorial from the university library. The article should address a business issue that interests you.

Instructions:

Download and complete the "Critical Thinking Worksheet: Analyzing an Editorial" using the article you have chosen. The worksheet guides you through a step-by-step analysis of the article's argument. These steps are critical for your successful completion of an essay article you will complete at the end of Week 6.

  • Fill out all sections of the provided worksheet completely.
  • Your analysis should be thorough, addressing all questions and prompts on the worksheet.
  • Support your analysis with at least 2 credible sources beyond the article itself, and properly cite them in Section 5 of the worksheet using APA format.
  • Submit the completed WordDoc worksheet for grading
  • This assignment is worth 14% of your final grade.

Critical Thinking Worksheet: Analyzing an Editorial - USE THE ATTACHED

Blank template table with six labeled fields for article reference information: Name, Date, Article Title, Author, Publication, and Date of Publication.
Name:Date:
Article Title:Author:
Publication:Date of Publication:

Section 1: Article Overview (10 points)

  1. Provide a full citation of the article (APA format):
    Author, (year). Title. Reference details
  2. Summarize the article in 3–5 sentences:

Section 2: Argument Analysis (30 points)

  1. What is the main argument or thesis of the article?
  2. List the key premises (supporting points) the author uses:
  3. What evidence does the author provide? Is it credible?
  4. Can you independently verify any of the evidence? Provide one example and your source:
  • Claim:
  • Your Source:
  • Verification Summary:

Section 3: Critical Evaluation (25 points)

  1. Does the author address counterarguments? If so, how?
  2. Does the author appear to represent a particular interest or bias? Explain:
  3. How is language used to persuade the reader? (e.g., tone, word choice, rhetorical devices):
  4. Do you notice any logical fallacies or errors in reasoning? List and explain one if present:

Section 4: Ethical and Critical Reflection (20 points)

  1. What are the ethical implications of the issue discussed?
  2. How does this article influence your thinking about the issue?
  3. Overall, how compelling is the article? Rate from 1 (not compelling) to 5 (very compelling) and explain your rating:
  • Rating: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5
  • Explanation:

Section 5: Research Integration (15 points)

  1. List at least 2 credible sources you used to support your analysis (APA format):