discussion

Overview

Discussion Thread: Case Study Research: Digital Considerations

Types of Iterative Bounding

Regarding ‘iterative bounding’, discuss the 3 types (spatial, temporal, and relational).

Application of Bounding to an Element of a Digital Case Study Design

THEN show how you would apply at least 1 of these 3 types of bounding to 1 of 8 elements in a digital case study design. Remember brevity, be concise – see rubric.

Please review the Discussion Assignment InstructionsDownload Discussion Assignment Instructions prior to posting. You may also click the three dots in the upper corner to Show Rubric.

Post-First: This course utilizes the Post-First feature in all Discussions. This means you will only be able to read and interact with your classmates’ threads after you have submitted your thread in response to the provided prompt.

DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. For each Discussion, you will post one

thread of as close to 300 words as possible by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned

Module: Week. You must then post 1 reply to one of your peers of as close to 300 words as

possible by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, you

must support your assertions with at least 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly citations (besides the

possible use of the course texts and the Bible) in current APA format. Each reply must

incorporate at least 1 peer-reviewed, scholarly citation (besides your peer’s citation/reference and

the possible use of the course texts and the Bible) in current APA format. Any external sources

cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include scholarly

articles, the course textbooks, the Bible, etc.). Biblical integration is NOT required.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS

Bold print are suggested headings or action words that should help you be successful in

completing your thread. Suggested headings for replies: Peer’s Point, Support/Refute/

Addition

Provide a complete academic and scholarly peer response identifying a point in the

classmate’s original post and expound upon it (i.e., writing as a consultant TO a business

decision-maker with the context of your original and a peers thread) taking a support,

refute or additive perspective (not writing to your peer directly). Salutory-type comments

such as ‘Thanks, Sue. . ..” or “I loved your post. . .,” or, “Your sources are awesome. . .”,

or “I agree with your post” are not included in the word count and should be omitted

(cover and references are also not included in the word count).

NOTE: In your reply post, you ARE influenced by your peer, so, when using/referring

to a peer’s main thread, you must cite them and include them in the Reference listing.

Paste your text directly into the message window in the Learning Management System.

Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another

course.

Be sure to use current APA formatting for all elements of your main threads and replies.

Scholarly sources must have publication dates within the past 5 years. Do not use any

books other than the Bible, and our other course textbooks (if applicable).

In-text citations are required to support your statements, points, assertions, issues,

arguments, concerns, paragraph topic sentences, and statements of fact and opinion.

Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, and encyclopedias will not be

accepted.

All parts of the assignment must be based on scholarly, academic work.

Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, and

language that is too informal and too subjective.