OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Marketing · Studypool

MKTG1071 Strategic Marketing

A1: Increasing Customer Base

Format: Report | Individual
Client: Apple Music

Weighting: 15%

Word count: 1-page

Due Date: Week 5, Sunday, April 6, 23:59 pm AEST
Sample: Exemplar (from a similar but different challenge)_by CharlesDownload Exemplar (from a similar but different challenge)_by Charles

Submission details

Task details

Please see Assessment 1 instructions for a full description of your task.

Key advice:

  • How can you best explain your segment(s) to Apple Music given page limitation?
  • Write succinctly
  • Sometimes pictures/graphics/graphs/tables say more than words
  • You can suggest any strategic marketing changes, but this challenge does have a comms focus

Marking criteria

This assessment will measure your ability to:

  • Segment Identification = 20%
  • Target market selection and justification = 30%
  • Advertisement development and channel selection/justification = 20%
  • Solution critical thinking and innovation = 20%
  • Presentation/Professionalism = 10%

Assessment Policies

Referencing Guidelines

Use RMIT HarvardLinks to an external site. referencing style for this assessment.

You must acknowledge all the courses of information you have used in your assessments.

Refer to the RMIT Easy CiteLinks to an external site. referencing tool for examples and tips on referencing in the appropriate style. You can also refer to the library referencing page for more tools, such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing.

Academic Integrity and Plagiarism

Academic integrityLinks to an external site. is about the honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your insights, knowledge and ideas.

You should take extreme care that you have:

  • Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods
  • Provide a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites.

Suppose you do not acknowledge the sources of your material. In that case, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing as if they were your own.

RMIT University treats plagiarism as a grave offence constituting misconduct.

Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including:

  • Failure to properly document a source
  • Copyright material from the internet or databases
  • Collusion between students

For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University websiteLinks to an external site..

Assessment Declaration

When you submit work electronically, you agree to the Assessment declarationLinks to an external site.

Rubric

Challenge 1: Increasing Customer Base

Challenge 1: Increasing Customer Base

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSegment Identification CLO1

20 to >16.0 Pts

HD

Segments have been excellently identified and justified according to the clients needs

16 to >14.0 Pts

D

Segments have been very well identified and justified according to the clients needs

14 to >12.0 Pts

C

Segments have been well identified and justified according to the clients needs

12 to >10.0 Pts

P

Segments have been somewhat identified and justified according to the clients needs

10 to >0.0 Pts

N

Vague or missing key information

0 Pts

DNS

Did not submit

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeTarget market selection and justification CLO1; CLO 4

30 to >24.0 Pts

HD

Target market was excellently identified and justified based on market growth potential.

24 to >21.0 Pts

D

Target market was very well identified and justified based on market growth potential.

21 to >18.0 Pts

C

Target market was well identified and justified based on market growth potential.

18 to >15.0 Pts

P

Target market was somewhat identified and justified based on market growth potential.

15 to >0.0 Pts

N

Vague or missing key information

0 Pts

DNS

Did not submit

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAdvertisement development and channel selection/justification CLO2; CLO4

20 to >16.0 Pts

HD

Advertisement development and channel selection/justification was excellent.

16 to >14.0 Pts

D

Advertisement development and channel selection/justification was very good.

14 to >12.0 Pts

C

Advertisement development and channel selection/justification was good.

12 to >10.0 Pts

P

Advertisement development and channel selection/justification was average.

10 to >0.0 Pts

N

Vague or missing key information

0 Pts

DNS

Did not submit

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSolution Critical Thinking and Innovation CLO1; CLO2

20 to >16.0 Pts

HD

Solution is highly innovative, moved away from the norm and was applied taking an incredibly strong critical lens.

16 to >14.0 Pts

D

Solution is mostly innovative, moved away from the norm and was applied taking a very strong critical lens.

14 to >12.0 Pts

C

Solution is generally innovative, generally moved away from the norm and was applied taking a critical lens

12 to >10.0 Pts

P

Solution is barely innovative, only somewhat moved away from the norm and lacked major critical thinking

10 to >0.0 Pts

N

Vague or missing key information

0 Pts

DNS

Did not submit

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation/Professionalism

10 to >8.0 Pts

HD

Challenge is excellently presented with no spelling/grammar errors and is written concisely but still gets key points across. Fully represents what you would give to a client.

8 to >7.0 Pts

D

Challenge is very well presented with no major spelling/grammar errors and is written concisely but still gets key points across. Mostly represents what you would give to a client.

7 to >6.0 Pts

C

Challenge is well presented with minor spelling/grammar errors and/or is mostly written concisely but still gets points across. Generally represents what you would give to a client.

6 to >5.0 Pts

P

Challenge is presented with some major spelling/grammar errors and/or is written concisely but lacks clarity or is above the word count. Not likely what you would give to a client.

5 to >0.0 Pts

N

Poor, missing key information, poorly presented and /or major spelling and grammar errors. Absolutely doesn't represent client quality.

0 Pts

DNS

Did not submit

10 pts