Overview
Component C – Revised Recommendations Report
Weighting: 25%. Length: 5 Pages maximum. Due: Friday 11:59pm, Week 9.
Component C – Revised Recommendations Report is designed to solicit your final recommendations
on how the organisation should design their interaction with consumers.
In your Revised Recommendations Report:
Recommendations Report and then make edits to it in light of the feedback you received
about those recommendations.
o Use your document’s track changes (e.g., track changes in Word) to indicate the text
that you changed from the initial Recommendations Report.
▪ Text that is crossed out does not count towards your page limit.
o Stronger Recommendation Reports will typically be supported by mock-ups (i.e., an
artistic rendering of your design) or specific examples in the Appendix.
and findings from Weeks 5-8 of the subject. In essence, you must argue why, based on the
theory, concept, or finding, your recommendation is very likely going to be effective.
o Stronger Recommendation Reports will typically be supported by research
discovered via independent academic literature scans.
you made in the initial Recommendations Report with the best recommendation you made
in the Revised Recommendations Report. Conclude by identifying the overall most
important recommendation you have for the organisation.
o Your evaluation may include comparison of the different recommendations’ likely
short- and long-term plausibility, effectiveness, and reception.
be highlighted in yellow to make clear what has been added since your initial
Recommendations Report.
o Revised Recommendations Reports that have no highlighting will be penalised. 24710 Customer Experience and Behaviour
4
Assessment Task 1
double-spacing, Times New Roman 12-point font, 2.54cm margins on all sides of the paper,
and page numbers in the top-right corner of each page.
o You must cite every theory, concept, or finding you mention.
o Never cite the lecturer or lecture notes; cite the original academic reference.
crossed out text due to tracked changes, References section, and any Appendices) will be
penalised.
o Suitability of the recommendations (30%):
▪ To what extent are the new recommendations novel, plausible, culturally
aware, likely to achieve their goals, and likely to be well-received by the
target audience?
o Application of theoretical concepts (30%):
▪ To what extent are the new recommendations motivated by relevant and
correctly interpreted academic research and customer and consumer
behaviour theories, concepts, and findings from secondary sources related
to content from Weeks 5-8?
o Appropriateness of recommendation evaluation (20%):
▪ To what extent are the recommendations’ potential, both in terms of
practicalities and theoretical underpinnings, accurately compared?
o Quality of report (20%):
▪ To what extent is the report laid out appropriately and professionally with a
logical flow, written with no sentence structure issues, typographical errors,
or inappropriate use of language all while using APA style and remaining
within the page limit?