Assignments 1
Determining Accuracy and Credibility
When conducting research and examining data, it is important to determine the accuracy and credibility of the information.
Develop an original response to the following questions:
- When examining data, how do you determine the accuracy and credibility of the information?
- From the articles in this module, what are your questions about the accuracy and credibility of the articles?
Comment on the posts of at least two classmates. APA citations are required only for the original response.
Assignment 2
The Mathematics of Real Life
If we intentionally look for mathematics in our daily lives, we become aware of the prevalence of mathematical connections. News stories often capture our attention with data and statistical analyses.
In this assignment, you will select a news story, identify the use of mathematical findings within the story, uncover potential author bias, and relate bias to reader interpretation. You will present your findings in a digital poster.
Step 1 Download the ACE Digital Poster Template to use for this assignment.
Step 2 Watch or read a real news story, past or present, that refers to data or statistics.
Identify the use of mathematical findings in the information presented. What did the numbers tell you?
In your digital poster, summarize the story and the use of mathematics.
Step 3 Behind every story is an author. What potential bias could be found with the interpretation of the data presented by the source-author or group? Include this information in your digital poster.
Step 4
Address the following questions in your poster:
- How does potential bias guide interpretation?
- How do you make an informed decision factoring in the mathematical data and the emotional response?
- What role do bias and extraneous variables play in decision-making?
Step 5 In your poster, provide an example of a personal bias which influences your professional choices.
Step 6
Submit your digital poster.
Please read the Assignment GuidelinesLinks to an external site. before you begin working.
Rubric
Master's Presentation Rubric v.3
Master's Presentation Rubric v.3
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConceptual Understanding/ Focus and Purpose | | 20 to >16.9 pts Mastery A. Clearly addressed all elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated a conceptual understanding of the real-world application. C. Clearly and concisely focused on the topic and purpose. D. Integrated complex, content-specific ideas, concepts, and examples. | 16.9 to >13.9 pts Marginal A. Addressed most of the elements of the assignment. B. Somewhat demonstrated a conceptual understanding of the real-world application. C. Marginally focused on either the topic and/or purpose. D. Presented ideas, concepts, and/or examples, but presentation was difficult to follow in some places. | 13.9 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement A. Did not address the elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated little to no conceptual understanding of the real-world application. C. Lacked focus on the topic and/or purpose. D. Included minimal ideas, concepts, and/or examples, and presentation was difficult to follow. | 0 pts No submission |
| 20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis, Evaluation and Use of Evidence to Support Presentation | | 30 to >25.4 pts Mastery A. Clearly addressed the issue/problem. B. Demonstrated scholarly analysis and evaluation. C. Demonstrated a connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated critical thinking surrounding the issue/problem with depth and breadth. E. Correctly used a variety of scholarly references as evidence. F. Cited literature and research beyond sources provided in the course. | 25.4 to >20.9 pts Marginal A. Addressed most of the issue/problem. B. Demonstrated scholarly analysis and evaluation. C. Demonstrated a marginal connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated a superficial understanding of the issue/problem. E. Demonstrated a marginal use of scholarly references. F. Demonstrated a marginal use of literature and research provided in the course. | 20.9 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement A. Addressed some aspects of the issue/problem. B. Demonstrated little to no scholarly analysis and evaluation. C. Demonstrated little to no connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated limited evidence of understanding the problem/issue. E. Displayed little to no use of references. F. Demonstrated little to no use of literature and research provided in the course. | 0 pts No submission |
| 30 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Cohesion | | 30 to >25.4 pts Mastery A. Established a well-defined sequence to address purpose. Introduction, body, and B. Conclusion were engaging and easy to follow. | 25.4 to >20.9 pts Marginal A. Established a sequence to address the purpose with some limitations. B. Introduction, body, and conclusion were marginally clear and easy to follow. | 20.9 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement A. Lacked organization and sequence to address the purpose. B. Introduction, body and conclusion were unclear and difficult to follow. | 0 pts No submission |
| 30 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Delivery of Presentation/Product | | 10 to >8.4 pts Mastery A. Proficiently used technology to support the presentation. B. Applied all required elements of the assignment in the deliverable. C. Exhibited professional skills for product/presentation. IF Oral Presentation: A. Presenter was expertly prepared. B. Voice was clear and at an appropriate volume. C. Correctly used and pronounced terminology. D. Avoided distracting filler words such as “um”. IF Video/Live Presentation: A. Displayed professional dress. B. Maintained eye contact. C. No visible distractions noted. | 8.4 to >6.9 pts Marginal A. Demonstrated some ability to use technology to support the presentation. B. Applied some elements of the assignment in the deliverable. C. Exhibited marginal skills for product/presentation. IF Oral Presentation: A. Presenter was minimally prepared. B. Voice was low and difficult to hear. C. Incorrectly used and/or pronounced some terms. D. Occasionally used distracting filler words such as “um”. IF Video/Live Presentation: A. Displayed unprofessional dress. B. Maintained some eye contact. C. Some visible distractions noted. | 6.9 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement A. Demonstrated limited ability to use technology to support the presentation. B. Applied limited elements of the assignment in the deliverable. C. Exhibited limited skills for product/presentation. IF Oral Presentation: A. Presenter was unprepared. B. Voice was unclear and/or difficult to hear. C. Incorrectly used and/or pronounced terms. D. Repeatedly used distracting filler words such as “um”. IF Video/Live Presentation: A. Displayed unprofessional dress. B. Used little to no eye contact. C. Visible distractions noted throughout. | 0 pts No submission |
| 10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing/APA Format | | 10 to >8.4 pts Mastery A. Exceeded or met scholarly writing and/or presentation skills. B. Demonstrated correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling. C. Demonstrated near perfect APA formatting. | 8.4 to >6.9 pts Marginal A. Met or marginally met a basic level of writing and/or presentation skills. B. Demonstrated inconsistent use of grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling. C. Demonstrated marginally correct APA formatting. | 6.9 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement A. Basic writing and/or presentation skills were present. B. Demonstrated difficulty with grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling. C. Demonstrated limited correct APA formatting. | 0 pts No submission |
| 10 pts
|
Total Points: 100 |