Overview
Content: Your third paper should summarize your position, on a matter of philosophical import--the same matter you discussed in your first two papers. This should be done in approximately 600 words.
In some respects your paper should be much the same as your first: you should not try to summarize everything you believe--just one claim should be summarized in depth. It may be a metaphysical claim, a value claim, or an epistemological claim, but it should be one of those! Your position may be grounded in one or both of the positions you previously explored, or it may deviate from both, but regardless your position should account for both of the positions you previously explored--for example, by synthesizing them, denying them both, or arguing that one is more plausible than the other for whatever reason. Your paper should cite few sources--obviously you should cite the original work of any philosopher you mention, but beyond that you should not use more than one or two other sources. Your bibliography should not be included in your word count. I do not have a citation format preference beyond "consistent."