Overview
Hello, we had to watch a presentation and write our reflection on it in the template format attached below. Please use the textook chapters attached below as well as the presentation transcript and outside scholarly resources. NO AI PLEASE.
I have attached the instructions below as well as the needed textbook and transcript. (IN AREAS IF YOU USE SOMETHING FROM THE TRANSCRIPT PLEASE LET ME KNOW WITH A (INSERT TRANSCRIPT CITATION IN YELLOW HIGHLIGHT AND I WILL ADD THE REFERENCE TO THAT)
INSTRUCTIONS:
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also, discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1. Go over the scenario transcript.
2. Fill out the template attached below.
3. Compose the last question on the template reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?
- 4. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
- 5. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
- TEMPLATE:
2 Week 3 Scenario and Reflection Essay Write your introduction. Tell us what the paper is about. Provide a solid paragraph. If you use any sources here, be sure to cite them. The correct citations for the resources I have provided below are: (Pence, 2021) or (Pence, 2021, p. #) if you are quoting for the textbook. For the presentation, the correct citations are: (Instructor last name, n.d.) if you are not quoting. You must include a timestamp in the citation when quoting the video (Instructor last name, n.d., 1:21) if the quote starts one minute and 21 seconds into the video. The video doesn’t provide a timeline, so you have to time it yourself. I suggest always paraphrasing rather than quoting. If you use more than one video from the class, then you must distinguish between in your paper. Put the sources in alphabetical order (as I have here) and use n.d.-a, n.d.-b, etc. in citations. If you only use one video, only use n.d. (not n.d.-a, n.d.-b, etc.). Use your instructor’s name for any class videos or PowerPoints that you use/cite. The second paragraph should cover how you feel about the topic and why. Consider the following questions. Did you have any views on the issue prior to viewing the scenario? If so, what were they? Did they change over the course of listening to the arguments? If so, how? The third paragraph should cover which of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why. This is where you need to be sure to support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics (Care Ethics, Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, Social Contract Ethics [Hobbes, Rousseau or Rawls version of the Social Contract], Act Utilitarianism, or Rule Utilitarianism [not just utilitarianism – this is wrong] to defend your stance. Refer back to the material covered in Week 1.
TEMPLATE
Week 3 Scenario and Reflection Essay Write your introduction. Tell us what the paper is about. Provide a solid paragraph. If you use any sources here, be sure to cite them. The correct citations for the resources I have provided below are: (Pence, 2021) or (Pence, 2021, p. #) if you are quoting for the textbook.
The second paragraph should cover how you feel about the topic and why. Consider the following questions.
Did you have any views on the issue prior to viewing the scenario? If so, what were they?
Did they change over the course of listening to the arguments? If so, how?
The third paragraph should cover which of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why. This is where you need to be sure to support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics (Care Ethics, Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, Social Contract Ethics [Hobbes, Rousseau or Rawls version of the Social Contract], Act Utilitarianism, or Rule Utilitarianism [not just utilitarianism – this is wrong] to defend your stance. Refer back to the material covered in Week 1 Chapter 2 and 3 of the texbook.
The last paragraph is your conclusion. Tell us what you learned and how this experience might have changed or informed your stance on the topic. While you don’t necessarily need to refer to research here, supporting your opinion with credible sources (proving you have made an informed opinion) is best.