Recommend ABA Solutions.

Post ID: 3419433

Hide Assignment Information

Instructions

Read each ethical query below and make a recommendation for how the individual could proceed. Cite the relevant BACB ethics code.

“Case 24: Muffin Melodrama. Dr. Lorton is a developmental pediatrician who often conducts diagnostic assessments for individuals with a potential ASD diagnosis. He has several ABA-based agencies in his referral rolodex. Jade is a BCBA-D who has received several recent referrals from Dr. Lorton. To show her appreciation and maintain the professional relationship, Jade has sent Dr. Lorton’s office staff a basket of muffins along with a ‘Thank you’ card.” [p. 76; Sush, D., & Najdowski, A. C. (2019). A Workbook of Ethical Case Scenarios in Applied Behavior Analysis. Academic Press.]

“Case 25: Word of Mouth. Carlos, a BCBA, is conducting an observation of a learner named Chase in the school setting when he is approached by the parent of another student in Chase’s class. The parent told Carlos that she is interested in starting ABA-based services for her daughter and has been looking for an agency. She mentioned that the teacher told her to speak with Carlos since he is a BCBA supervising Chase’s program. She asked for Carlos’ business card so she could speak to him about initiating services with his agency.” [p. 78; Sush, D., & Najdowski, A. C. (2019). A Workbook of Ethical Case Scenarios in Applied Behavior Analysis. Academic Press.]

Length: This assignment must be 1-3 pages (excluding the title and reference page).

References: Include 3 scholarly resources.

Criteria	Exceeds Expectations	Meets Expectations	Approaches Expectations	Below Expectations	Criterion Score
	10 points Includes relevant BACB code, citing it and including a thorough rationale.	9 points Includes relevant BACB code, citing it and including a weak rationale.	8 points Includes relevant BACB code, citing it and including a minimal rationale.	7.5 points No relevant BACB code, minimal rationale.	Score of Recommendation Quality, / 10
	5 points Writes a coherent recommendation with a logical flow to the writing and grammatically accurate.	4.5 points Writes a coherent recommendation with a logical flow to the writing and grammatically accurate with only minor errors.	4 points Presents a coherent recommendation with a logical flow to the writing but grammatically inaccurate.	3.75 points Writes an incoherent recommendation with no logical flow to the writing and grammatically inaccurate.	Score of Communication, / 5
	5 points	4.5 points	4 points	3.75 points	Score of Organization, / 5

Score of Scenario Assignments Rubric,

/ 20

Overall Score

Exceeds Expectations

18 points minimum

Meets Expectations

16 points minimum

Approaches Expectations

15 points minimum

Below Expectations

0 points minimum