Overview
- BRIEF INTRO: Introduce your case study. What are the research questions guiding your analysis? (i.e. the ethical issues, questions or dilemmas being addressed in your case study). Make sure to provide a thesis in your introduction.
- Background:
- WHAT IS THE BUREAUCRACY/INSTITUTION BEING STUDIED--WHAT IS IT?
- WHERE IS THE AGENCY/OFFICE LOCATED? HOW IS IT ORGANIZED?
- WHAT IS ITS FUNCTION? WHAT IS IT RESPONSIBLE FOR? WHAT ISSUE (S) DOES IT ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS? Identify all the actors involved in the situation (individuals, organizations, personnel, etc.):
- Who is made the decision?
- Who had influence over the decision-maker and how so and/or why?
- Who did the decision effect?
- WHAT WAS THE SPECIFIC ETHICAL ISSUE/PROBLEM ( IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF POLICY ) What is the ethical dilemma?
- How had this issue been framed by government, media, groups, etc.?---Make sure to fully described the situation the public administrator is facing
- WHICH EXISTING THEORIES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ETHICS APPLY OR BEST EXPLAINS THE ETHICAL DILEMMA?WHAT HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF THE POOR PERFORMANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY, OR THE CRISES? WHAT CHANGES WERE MADE TO AVOID FUTURE ETHICAL ISSUES?
-
- Apply the ethical theories discussed in class
- Described how a decision would possibly be made in accordance with each specific normative theory with an in-depth analysis
- Described what an ethical decision should look like
- INCORPORATE THE APSA'S CODE OF ETHICS
- is the decision is in accordance with the ASPA Code of Ethics?
- how did the decision fit in and complies with the 8 principles of the ASPA Code. ?
- DISCUSS YOUR TAKEAWAY (Conclusion).
- What is your position on the ethical dilemma?
- What would you have done in this situation?
- What did you learn? What are the "lessons learned"? (See Menzel's lessons
ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS/REMINDERS:
- In your analysis/case study you should Include the following: course readings, articles or reports from government/group/party websites and at least 3 (MIN) academic articles from the CSUN databases.
- ALSO, include at least 5 primary sources such as newspaper/investigative reports (ProPublica, ACLU, etc.)
- Back up any statements OR quotes from the text/sources. DO NOT OVER QUOTE--PARAPHRASE.
- INCLUDE PAGE NUMBERS AND IN TEXT CITATIONS/FOOTNOTES IN YOUR ANALYSIS.
- You should incorporate the ETHICAL FRAMEWORKS discussed in class/readings. INCLUDE THE ASSIGNED READINGS AND INCLUDE SOURCES IN YOUR PRESENTATION. Cite sources/reading in your paper(Chicago, APA, MLA)
RECAP: SOME HELPFUL TIPS--IN YOUR CASE STUDY SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY:
- THE CONTEXT OF THE OPERATION OF GOVERNMENT (ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, SOCIAL, ETC.). WHAT ARE THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCED THE BEHAVIOR OF GOVERNMENT OR AGENCY YOU ARE EXAMINING?
- THE ROLE OF FEDERALISM (FEDERAL/STATE RELATIONS) AND OR .THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS; POLITICAL PARTIES, LEADERS OR INSTITUTIONS (STATE, FEDERAL, SUPREME COURT) IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROCESS/IN INFLUENCING ITS FUNCTION.
- THE ROLE OF INFORMAL POLICY ACTORS IN CREATING THE ETHICAL ISSUE--INTEREST GROUPS, MEDIA, Public Opinion, ETC. IN INFLUENCING THE EFFICACY OF OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. IS THERE "AGENCY CAPTURE"?
- THE IMPACT OF THE AGENCY/OFFICE AND EXTERNAL/INTERNAL INFLUENCES ON POLICY AND POLICY OUTCOMES (GOOD, BAD?) WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED IN YOUR CASE STUDY? WHO WAS REPSONSIBLE?
- THE RESPONSE, OR REFORMS/RESTRUCTURING AS A RESULT (e.g., restructuring of the intelligence agencies as a result of 9/11 or changes to lending as a result of the housing crises of 2008).