Psychology Question

Post ID: 3430680

Hello, ok I received feedback on my paper and I have made some mistakes that I need help with, I need to review the first part of my project to make sure it aligns with the rest of the paper cause initially I said I was gonna use three groups and then the instructor said to use only two and form there I wroked based on that but forgot to fix the first part, also the paper you sent me had the formula for the chi square test and I had to correct it to the coefficient r, can you make sure everything there is right, also the forms have more people that what I really need because it was suppose to be 10, 5 for each group, but more classmates have been doing them and it seems that when you worked with the forms there were 7 in each group we need to correct that and to do it Ill send u one assignment meant to verify the people that participated so it has only the ones we need, also need to check the APA format for the whole document to make sure this is right, I am also including the feedback the professor gave me so you can work on that, this is the final paper and she said it can be invalidated if it is not correct, I need you to be meticulous please,

feedback recevied:

Week 9 Assignment 2: Data Analysis and Interpretation
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Describe participants using demographic statistics.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes participants using demographic statistics that reflect an awareness of sociocultural differences. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Describes participants using demographic statistics. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies participants, but does not describe participants using demographic statistics. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify participants. Comments:	20 / 20 pts
Explain the statistical measures used to analyze the data.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Explains the statistical measures used to analyze the data with evidence to support their use. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Explains the statistical measures used to analyze the data. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not explain the statistical measures used to analyze the data. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify or explain the statistical measures used to analyze the data. Comments: Great explanation of the statistical measure you used on your data! The problem is that test is not appropriate for a study with 3 test groups. Either your hypothesis and description of variables or your procedures and results are incorrect. All these parts of your paper must align!	17 / 20 pts
Create a data table.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Creates a data table in APA style. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Creates a data table. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Creates a table that is missing needed data. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not create a data table. Comments: Great table! It wasn't quite in APA style - remember to use the right style for table number, headings, and table title. See https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/tables-figures/tables for more details and examples.	17 / 20 pts
Report statistical findings using APA style.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Reports statistical findings using error-free APA style appropriate for the data collected. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Reports statistical findings using APA style. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Reports statistical findings but either does not use APA style or the APA style has significant errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not report statistical findings. Comments In the Review, you indicated you would be testing three groups (1) myth only, (2) fact only, (3) myth vs fact. In this case, it looks as though you only tested two groups (which is in keeping with your Unit 8 Assignment) although the number of participants listed in your table does not match what you reported in the Unit 8 assignment -- you reported 10 in the assignment and listed 14 in your tables here. The biggest problem is that you did not indicate which was your control group and which was your test group	17 / 20 pts
Describe statistical significance using APA style.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes statistical significance using error-free APA style appropriate for the study. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Describes statistical significance using APA style. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Describes statistical significance, but either does not use APA style or the APA style contains significant errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe statistical significance. Comments Did you run a comparison of pre test scores to see whether your groups were similar to begin with? If not, how can you be sure there were no changes from pre to post test scores based n the post test scores alone?	17 / 20 pts
Interpret statistical findings using common language.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Interprets statistical findings using common language that maintains a scholarly tone. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Interprets statistical findings using common language. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Interprets statistical findings, but language is unclear or inaccurate. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not interpret statistical findings. Comments: Wonderful job sharing your statistical findings in common, but academic, language. The language is common but the results do not add up!	20 / 20 pts
Describe the influence of effect size using APA style.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes influence of effect size using error-free APA style appropriate for the study. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Describes the influence of effect size using APA style. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Describes influence of effect size, but either does not use APA style or the APA style contains significant errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe influence of effect size. Comments	20 / 20 pts
Write an organized paper with purpose, evidence, sentence structure, and scholarly tone.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Writes an organized paper that maintains appropriate verb tense and has clear purpose, evidence, sentence structure, and scholarly tone. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Writes an organized paper with purpose, evidence, sentence structure, and scholarly tone. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Writes a paper but may be lacking purpose, missing evidence, or the sentence structure or tone is unclear. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not write a paper. Comments: Well written paper although with some contradictions in the evidence in places (see notes from other scoring elements for a more thorough description of the discrepancies)..	17 / 20 pts
Use APA style formatting, citations, and references.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses error-free APA style formatting, citations, and references, including proper title page. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Uses APA style formatting, citations, and references. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Uses APA style formatting with significant errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not use APA style formatting. Comments	20 / 20 pts
Revise content to include instructor feedback.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Creates new insights by revising content to include instructor feedback. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Revises content to include instructor feedback. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Partially revises content to include instructor feedback. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not revise content. Comments: Your literature review and original hypothesis predicted a comparison of 3 separate groups: one myth only, one fact only; one myth vs fact. Your procedures indicated you only compared two groups an your Unit 8 assignment only identified 2 groups. The review, methods section, and procedures cannot say different things. They must be consistent throughout the whole study! Your proposal was written in future tense, it should be changed to past tense for the report of results.	17 / 20

Here's the instructions for the final assignment where the paper must be fully corrected before doing it:

Instructions

For the Week 10 assignment, you will write the Discussion section and the Summary and Conclusion section of the template. The expected length is approximately three pages.

In the Discussion section, answer the following questions:

Interpret your results.
- What do your results mean?
  - How do your results compare to what you predicted in your hypothesis?
  - How do your results compare to other research studies?
    - Make connections between your results and the sources cited in your literature review.
Describe the generalizability of your results.
- Is your sample representative of the population you were trying to study?
  - Include multiple demographic variables.
Analyze the implications and consequences of your findings.
- If your results are correct, what should society do with them?
- What should psychologists do with them?
Discuss the limitations and future directions of the study.
- Discuss research validity and reliability as they relate to your results.
- Consider your interpretation of the results and discussion of the limitations above when making forward-looking suggestions.
Relate your results to a psychological theory or concept.
- Do your results support or not support a psychological theory or concept?
  - Make connections between your results and the sources cited in your literature review.

In the Summary and Conclusion section:

Provide a brief summary of the key points, and end with your conclusions.

Remember to consult the scoring rubric to make sure you cover all that will be assessed.

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Write in a professional style that has purpose, evidence, sentence structure, and scholarly tone.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to APA style and formatting.
Length: Approximately three typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Differentiate between types of psychological research methods.
- Use quantitative analysis to argue in favor of or against a hypothesis.
Competency 2: Design research that controls for variations in behavior related to individual and sociocultural differences.
- Describe conditions of the research findings related to generalizability.
- Analyze the implications and consequences of the study’s results.
- Discuss limitations and future directions of the study.
Competency 3: Design an ethically appropriate psychological research study.
- Interpret the study’s results to provide additional meaning.
- Relate the results to a psychological theory or concept.
Competency 4: Conduct a psychological research study.
- Conduct a study with a hypothesis based on operational definitions.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
- Address assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
- Use APA style formatting for citations and a reference list with only minor errors.
- Use APA style paper formatting with only minor errors.
- Incorporate feedback from prior assignments.

Week 10 Assignment 2: Research Report

Week 10 Assignment 2: Research Report
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Conduct a study with a hypothesis based on operational definitions.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Conducts a study with a hypothesis based on operational definitions and clearly follows the research proposal. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Conducts a study with a hypothesis based on operational definitions. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Conducts a study, but there is no hypothesis, or the study is not based on operational definitions. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not conduct a study.	/ 20 pts
Use quantitative analysis to argue in favor of or against a hypothesis.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses quantitative analysis to argue for or against a hypothesis that clearly relates to study design and results. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Uses quantitative analysis to argue in favor of or against a hypothesis. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Uses quantitative analysis to argue for or against a hypothesis, but there are errors in interpretation or explanation. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not use quantitative analysis to argue for or against a hypothesis.	/ 20 pts
Interpret the study’s results to provide additional meaning.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Interprets the study’s results, with cited discussion of prior literature in the proposal. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Interprets the study’s results to provide additional meaning. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Restates, but does not interpret, the study’s results. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not state or interpret the study’s results.	/ 20 pts
Describe conditions of the research findings related to generalizability.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes conditions of the research findings related to generalizability, including multiple demographic variables. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Describes conditions of the research findings related to generalizability. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies, but does not describe, conditions of the research findings related to generalizability. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify conditions of the research findings related to generalizability.	/ 20 pts
Analyze the implications and consequences of the study’s results.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes the implications and consequences of the study’s results, including the implications for society. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes the implications and consequences of the study’s results. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Describes the implications and consequences of the study’s results. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe or analyze the implications and consequences of the study’s results.	/ 20 pts
Discuss limitations and future directions of the study.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses limitations and future directions of the study, with connection to the concepts of reliability and validity. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Discusses limitations and future directions of the study. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses limitations or future directions of the study, but not both. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not discuss limitations or future directions of the study.	/ 20 pts
Relate the results to a psychological theory or concept.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Relates results to a psychological theory or concept with cited support. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Relates the results to a psychological theory or concept. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses a psychological theory or concept but does not relate to the results. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not discuss a psychological theory or concept.	/ 20 pts
Address assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Presents a focused purpose through strong organizational skills. Presents evidence through strong paraphrasing and summarizing as well as appropriate tone and sentence structure. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Addresses assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Addresses the assignment purpose with minimal issues related to evidence, tone, and sentence structure. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not respond to the assignment prompt or does not organize text appropriately, uses inappropriate tone, or does not include structurally sound sentences.	/ 20 pts
Use APA style formatting for citations and a reference list with only minor errors.	10 to >8.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses proper APA style formatting for citations and a reference list. 8.5 to >7 pts PROFICIENT Uses APA style formatting for citations and a reference list with only minor errors. 7 to >0 pts BASIC Uses APA style formatting for citations and a reference list, but has major errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not have citations or a reference list.	/ 10 pts
Use APA style paper formatting with only minor errors.	10 to >8.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses proper APA style formatting throughout paper, including spacing, title page, page numbers, and headings. 8.5 to >7 pts PROFICIENT Uses APA style paper formatting with only minor errors. 7 to >0 pts BASIC Uses APA style paper formatting, but has major errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not format paper in line with APA style guidelines.	/ 10 pts
Incorporate feedback from prior assignments.	20 to >17 pts DISTINGUISHED Incorporates feedback from prior assignments and provides new insights. 17 to >14 pts PROFICIENT Incorporates feedback from prior assignments. 14 to >0 pts BASIC Partially revises content to include instructor feedback. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not revise content.	/ 20 pts