OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Psychology · Studypool

Monica Project part 4

  • Supervision Plan:
    • Propose a supervision plan that incorporates fidelity checks, supported by the Capella Compassion Code.
  • References:
    • Cite the relevant examples and supporting evidence you used to guide your work. You will add to this section in each assignment.

Once these sections of the template have been completed, upload the completed template document to the assignment area.

Additional Requirements

  • Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Use current APA style for citations and references. Refer to Evidence and APALinks to an external site. for citing and referencing tips.
  • Length: 8–9 double-spaced pages, not including the title page or reference page.
  • References: A minimum of ten scholarly or professional resources.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

  • Competency 3: Develop a plan to measure and maintain intervention strategies.
    • Develop a generalization plan that allows the treatment plan to be implemented in various settings and with various people.
    • Develop a maintenance plan that outlines how and when to fade the schedule of reinforcement that addresses a target behavior.
    • Propose a supervision plan that incorporates fidelity checks, supported by the Capella Compassion Code.
  • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
    • Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
    • Successfully implement APA style.
Week 8 Assignment: Generalization and Maintenance Procedures/Supervision Plan
Week 8 Assignment: Generalization and Maintenance Procedures/Supervision Plan
CriteriaRatingsPts
Develop a generalization plan that allows the treatment plan to be implemented in various settings and with various people.

26 to >22.1 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Clearly, concisely yet thoroughly describes a generalization plan that will allow the proposed treatment plan to be implemented in various settings and with various people. Provides a rationale for the plan, supported with recent, relevant academic literature.

22.1 to >18.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Develops a generalization plan that allows the treatment plan to be implemented in various settings and with various people.

18.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Proposes a generalization plan, but it will not adequately allow the proposed treatment plan to be implemented in various settings with various people.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not develop a generalization plan that allows the treatment plan to be implemented in various settings and with various people.

/ 26 pts

Develop a maintenance plan that outlines how and when to fade the schedule of reinforcement that addresses a target behavior.

27 to >22.95 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Develops a detailed, comprehensive maintenance plan that outlines how and when to fade the schedule of reinforcement that addresses a target behavior. Provides a rationale for the plan supported with recent, relevant academic literature.

22.95 to >18.9 pts

PROFICIENT

Develops a maintenance plan that outlines how and when to fade the schedule of reinforcement that addresses a target behavior.

18.9 to >0 pts

BASIC

Develops a maintenance plan, but it does not adequately outline how and when to fade the schedule of reinforcement that addresses a target behavior.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not develop a maintenance plan that outlines how and when to fade the schedule of reinforcement that addresses a target behavior.

/ 27 pts

Propose a supervision plan that incorporates fidelity checks, supported by the Capella Compassion Code.

27 to >22.95 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Proposes a detailed and comprehensive plan that incorporates a sufficient number of fidelity checks and includes a rationale for the plan, supported by the Capella Compassion Code, and recent, relevant academic literature.

22.95 to >18.9 pts

PROFICIENT

Proposes a supervision plan that incorporates fidelity checks, supported by the Capella Compassion Code.

18.9 to >0 pts

BASIC

Develops a supervision plan, but it does not provide a sufficient number of fidelity checks.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not propose a supervision plan that incorporates fidelity checks.

/ 27 pts

Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

10 to >8.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Writes coherently, using evidence to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional.

8.5 to >7 pts

PROFICIENT

Writes coherently to support a central idea, with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

7 to >0 pts

BASIC

Writes to support an idea, but writing is inconsistent and contains numerous errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not write in a manner that supports a central idea or use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

/ 10 pts

Successfully implement APA style.

10 to >8.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Applies scholarly writing skills, using proper APA formatting and style in the body of the paper and references list.

8.5 to >7 pts

PROFICIENT

Successfully implements APA style with only minor errors in format.

7 to >0 pts

BASIC

Writes in a manner that is adequate, but has some APA errors and inconsistencies.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not apply proper APA formatting and style.

/ 10 pts

Total Points: 0