Psychology Question
Select one item from the BACB® 6th edition test content outline. Pinpoint a specific behavior or output/permanent product related to the task list item, operationally define it, and determine how you would evaluate a trainee's performance on the skill, both initially and ongoing. Would you include a checklist, BARS, quiz, or self-assessment? Would you use any fundamental measures or sampling procedures? How will you make your trainees comfortable being assessed on this skill?
Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module.
Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site.). Failing to do so will result in point deductions.
Reflection Paper Rubric
Reflection Paper Rubric | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words) | 5 ptsFull CreditReflection paper content was greater than 150 words. 3 ptsPartial CreditReflection paper content was between 100-149 words. 0 ptsZero CreditReflection paper content was less than 99 words. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Usage, and Spelling | 5 ptsFull CreditReflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors. 3 ptsPartial CreditReflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors. 0 ptsZero CreditReflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Utilization of Outside Resources | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more originally-sourced behavioral peer-reviewed scholarly article, outside of the assigned readings. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional originally-sourced behavioral peer-reviewed scholarly article (vice versa). 0 ptsZero CreditThe author did not utilize APA format for referenced material; did not use assigned reading nor cite an originally-sourced behavioral peer-reviewed scholarly article. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt but lacks cogent ideas, logical organization, and/or empirical writing. 0 ptsZero CreditThe author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author’s post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the week’s assigned reading/topic. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author’s post refers to the assigned topic/reading tangentially but does not demonstrate application. 0 ptsZero CreditThe author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author clearly articulates information that is not a direct summary of the materials presented in class or typical output from artificial intelligence. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author is able to articulate novel responses, but rudimentary summarization or typical output from artificial intelligence is detected. 0 ptsZero CreditThe author’s response is heavily verbatim or typical output of artificial intelligence. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 30
Sample Reflection Paper
Note:
- You must use APA formatting
- You may use first-person language for these assignments
- All elements of the prompts must be addressed
- At least one assigned reading and at least one outside scholarly article should be used to support your stance (websites and textbooks will not fulfill this requirement)
- All claims that are not authentically our own require supporting citation/reference
- These papers should be no more than 1-2 pages in length of content (excluding title and reference pages)
- You may check grammar with approved editing software (e.g., Word)
- You may not use software that creates, modifies, or or otherwise contributes to unoriginal content. This may result in disciplinary action.
I hope this is helpful!
This are the references she mentiones in the class, please use it:
- Read Reid, Parsons, & Green's Supervisor's Guidebook: Chapter 1 - The Importance of Supervision
- Read the Behavior Analysis Certification Board's Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts, Section 4.0 - Responsibility to Supervisees and Trainees
- Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. https://www.bacb.comLinks to an external site.
- Read Sellers, T. P., Alai-Rosales, S., & MacDonald, R. P. (2016). Taking full responsibility: The ethics of supervision in behavior analytic practice. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(4), 299-308.
- Read Reid, Parsons, & Green's Supervisor's Guidebook: Chapter 2 - An Evidence-based Protocol for Supervising Staff
- Review the Behavior Analysis Certification Board's supervision documentation: (Should be available here: https://www.bacb.com/supervision-and-training/Link... to an external site.)
-
- The BCBA 2022 Eligibility Requirements
- The RBT Handbook
- The BCaBA Handbook
-