PS563 Unit 7 Discussion
Punishment procedures, such as reprimands, overcorrection, time-out, and response cost are commonly used in applied behavior analysis. While these methods can be effective in reducing undesired behaviors, these procedures also carry the risk of emotional and elicited effects. It is essential to approach the use of punishment with a complete understanding of its potential benefits and risks, as well as the ethical considerations involved with implementing punishment procedures. Additionally, considering extinction from a compassionate care perspective is critical in our practice.
For this discussion, you will provide an argument on the use of punishment that is grounded in the readings provided in this unit. Based on the scenario, you will either present an argument FOR the use of punishment/extinction, or AGAINST the use of punishment/extinction procedures. To ensure that both sides of the argument are addressed, adhere to the following:
- Last names that start with the letters A through M will present FOR the use of punishment.( don't write on this one)
- Last names that start with the letters N through Z will present AGAINST the use of punishment.( Argue for this one)
It is important to understand both sides of the argument, as you will be responding to peers who present an opposing viewpoint.
Your argument should include the following considerations:
- Anti-punishment Argument:
- Provide examples of punishment and provide a justification against the use of punishment procedures.
- Evaluate the ethical considerations of punishment procedures and provide guidelines for ethical practice as supported by the BACB’s Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.
- Present an argument for the use of extinction from the perspective of compassionate care.
Review two of your classmates' responses, using the following ideas as a guide:
- Respond to at least one peer that presented the opposing viewpoint of your initial posting.
- Provide feedback on the argument relating to the use (or not) of punishment procedures and present a supported opposing view.
- Evaluate the ethical argument of the peer - does it make sense? Are there other ethical interpretations you can suggest?
- Respond to the viewpoints regarding the use of extinction procedures.
- Did your peer present a strong and valid argument that might sway your opinion?
- Ask at least one thoughtful follow up question.