Science Question

Post ID: 3065510

Describe and evaluate the differences between evidence based practice and research.
Describe the importance and application of health care information, data mining, and importance to application in patient care outcomes
Discuss how data mining and interpretation influences case management and utilization
Describe participation in managed care and the importance of quality care initiatives and performance indicators (remember to use AHRQ as a resource)

Parameters:

1000-1500 words not including the cover page and references (total, not for each topic)
Follow the APA 7th edition for references and citations
Include a minimum of 6 scholarly references (does not include text or websites)
Demonstrate analysis, evaluation and synthesis of information

Assessment Paper due Sunday at 11:59 PM.

Rubric

NU 626 Unit 4 Assessment Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

45 pts

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work.

41 pts

Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context).

36 pts

Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience's perceptions and assumptions).

31 pts

Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience).

27 pts

Little to no description of purpose and contents of paper.

0 pts

Not attempted

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Development

45 pts

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer's understanding, and shaping the whole work.

41 pts

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work.

36 pts

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work.

31 pts

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work.

27 pts

Little to no description of purpose and contents of paper.

0 pts

Not attempted

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

25 pts

Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task (s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices.

23 pts

Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices.

20 pts

Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation.

18 pts

Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation.

15 pts

Lacks evidence of clear, organized, comprehensive writing.

0 pts

Not attempted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

10 pts

Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing.

9 pts

Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

8 pts

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing.

7 pts

Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing.

6 pts

Does not include both APA and In- Text Citations or In-text citations and references are not in APA format.

0 pts

Not attempted.

10 pts