Overview
Part 1: complete a food diary of your own intake for 24 hours including the portion sizes of both foods and drinks. This will be the first part of your assignment. Organize the information into the table below. Part 2: Using the information you gathered from the food diary please outline in the next 3 columns how you would have to change your daily intake for the following chronic disorders: Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Hypertension. Please give specific examples of food swap options or portion alterations. You must make a minimum of 5 changes to your original intake. Below the modifications please include the rationale for why you made those changes for that disease process. You will need to site the source of the information you used to guide these recommendations in APA format. Part 3: Reflect on which proposed dietary modifications would be the most difficult to follow. Take into consideration the personal, religious, ethnic, and socio- economic factors that contribute to possible non-compliance with the plan. Write 3-5 sentences in the “reflection” row on the provided table. The following Rubric will be used: Criteria Ratings Possible Points Completion of a 24 hour food diary Excellent- 20 points Documented a 24 hour intake of food that includes food taken in, fluids ingested, provides portion sizes for all. Satisfactory- 18 points Fails to document one of the following components: a 24 hour intake of food that includes food taken in, fluids ingested, provides portion sizes for all. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Fails to document two of the following components: a 24 hour intake of food that includes food taken in, fluids ingested, provides portion sizes for all. No Evidence- 0 points Not present 20 points Modifications for Diabetes Mellitus Excellent- 20 points Describes at least 5 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of diabetes mellitus. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. Satisfactory- 18 points Describes 4 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of diabetes mellitus. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Describes 3 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of diabetes mellitus. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. No Evidence- 0 points Describes less than 3 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of diabetes mellitus. Fails to include specific food swap or portion alterations. 20 points Rationale for Modifications for Diabetes Mellitus Excellent- 20 points Provides a thorough description in 3-4 sentence of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of diabetes mellitus. Satisfactory- 18 points Provides a minimal description in less than 2 sentences of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of diabetes mellitus. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Provides an in adequate description in 1 sentence of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of diabetes mellitus. No Evidence- 0 points Failure to provide rationale 20 points Modifications for Chronic Kidney Disease Excellent- 20 points Describes at least 5 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of chronic kidney disease. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. Satisfactory- 18 points Describes 4 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of chronic kidney disease. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Describes 3 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of chronic kidney disease. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. No Evidence- 0 points Describes less than 3 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of chronic kidney disease. Fails to include specific food swap or portion alterations. 20 points Rationale for Modifications for Chronic Kidney Disease Excellent- 20 points Provides a thorough description in 3-4 sentence of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of chronic kidney disease. Satisfactory- 18 points Provides a minimal description in less than 2 sentences of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of chronic kidney disease. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Provides an in adequate description in 1 sentence of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of chronic kidney disease. No Evidence- 0 points Failure to provide rationale 20 points Modifications for Hypertension Excellent- 20 points Describes at least 5 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of Hypertension. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. Satisfactory- 18 points Describes 4 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of hypertension. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Describes 3 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of hypertension. This includes specific food swap or portion alterations. No Evidence- 0 points Describes less than 3 dietary modifications based on the therapeutic diet for management of hypertension. Fails to include specific food swap or portion alterations. 20 points Rationale for Modifications for Hypertension Excellent- 20 points Provides a thorough description in 3-4 sentence of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of hypertension. Satisfactory- 18 points Provides a minimal description in less than 2 sentences of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of hypertension. Unsatisfactory- 10 points Provides an in adequate description in 1 sentence of the rationale in the choices of changes to food diary to accommodate the therapeutic management of hypertension. No Evidence- 0 points Failure to provide rationale 20 pointsferences
Excellent- 10 points 0–3 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing Satisfactory- 8 points 4–9 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing Unsatisfactory-5 points >10 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing No Evidence- 0 points No references included. 10 points Total Possible Points 150