Originality Report
🚩🚩 🚩Turnitin enabled🚩🚩🚩
Telehealth Access and Remote Monitoring in Your Community(Examine how healthcare services in your specific ZIP code( 33177) are providing telehealth and remote monitoring options and whether these services benefit the patient population.)
Assignment Overview
In this essay, you will evaluate the extent to which healthcare services in your specific geographic area (use your ZIP code for specificity- NAME YOUR actual CITY where you live) are offering telehealth and remote monitoring options. You will analyze the impact of these services on patient care and outcomes. Your submission must include at least three examples that you uncovered through research in your neighborhood.
Requirements
Essay Format and Length:
- The assignment must be written as a formal essay.
- It must include an introduction, graduate-level discussion questions and responses, and a conclusion that synthesizes your key points.
- The paper should be a minimum of 3 pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference list. Please remember to include your textbook in the references: Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, C. M. A. (2022). Nurse leadership and management. Springer Publishing.
Content Specifics:
- Introduction:
- Introduce the topic with background information on telehealth and remote monitoring.
- Clearly state the purpose of your essay.
- Provide your ZIP code to contextualize the geographic focus of your study.
- Graduate-Level Questions & Analysis:
- Develop and answer at least two or three in-depth, graduate-level questions related to:
- How telehealth and remote monitoring options are integrated into local healthcare services.
- The benefits (or perceived benefits) these options offer to the patient population.
- Potential challenges or limitations associated with these technological advances.
- Make sure to substantiate your analysis with evidence-based practice (EBP). This should include referencing scholarly articles, government or institutional reports, and credible online sources.
- Include at least three concrete examples from your research in your local neighborhood that illustrate how these services are implemented. Explain how each example supports your discussion.
- Conclusion:
- Summarize your findings.
- Synthesize the key points discussed in your paper.
- Reflect on the overall impact of telehealth and remote monitoring services on patient care in your area.
APA Format:
- Your essay must strictly adhere to APA 7th Edition guidelines.
- Ensure correct use of APA formatting for the title page, headings/levels, in-text citations, and the reference list.
- Double-check that all references are accurately cited within your text and that your reference list is complete.
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):
- Develop your answers and support your analysis with evidence-based research.
- Incorporate data, statistics, and findings from peer-reviewed literature and reputable sources to lend credibility to your discussion.
- 4 current sources must be used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. All REFERENCES must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up
Rubric Review:
- Before submission, review the assignment rubric provided by your instructor. Make sure your essay addresses all the required components and meets the expected quality criteria.
Submission Guidelines
- File Format: Submit your assignment as a Word document or PDF via the designated course submission portal.
- Cover Page and References: A cover page and a separate references page are required. These pages are not included in the minimum page count.
- Deadline: Submit the final version of your essay by the due date specified in your course calendar.
- Proofreading: Check for clarity, coherence, grammar, and APA formatting before submission. A well-organized and carefully proofread paper will reflect your understanding and attention to detail.
By following these instructions, you will create a comprehensive, well-structured, and evidence-based analysis of how telehealth and remote monitoring options are utilized within your local healthcare services. This assignment not only highlights your ability to connect academic research with real-world healthcare practices but also demonstrates your capacity for critical thinking and graduate-level writing.
Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further clarification. Good luck with your research and writing!
Remember, your analysis should be both reflective and analytical, providing a robust discussion on how telehealth solutions are impacting patient care in your own neighborhood. Use your findings to contribute meaningful insights into the ongoing evolution of healthcare services.
REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.
Great resource to assist you: Reference List: Author/Authors - Purdue OWL® - Purdue University
........................................................................................................
Rubric Details
Maximum Score100 points
Integration of Knowledge
25% of total result
ExcellentThe paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. The required page count is met.
25
SatisfactoryThe paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. The required page count is one page below the number assigned.
20
UnsatisfactoryThe paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The required page count is 2 pages below the number assigned.
15
UnacceptableThe paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. The required page count is greater than 2 pages below the number assigned.
10
Topic Focus
25% of total result
ExcellentThe topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.
25
SatisfactoryThe topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.
20
UnsatisfactoryThe topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
15
UnacceptableThe topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
10
Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness
25% of total result
ExcellentIn-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
25
SatisfactoryIn-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
20
UnsatisfactoryThe writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the submission, but not both.
15
UnacceptableCursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.
10
Sources
7% of total result
Excellent4 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up
7
SatisfactoryUsed 3 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. 3 REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up
5.6
UnsatisfactoryUsed 2 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. 2 REFERENCES Must DOI Numbers for me to look them up
4.2
UnacceptableFewer than 2 current sources are used which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. Less than 2 REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up
2.8
APA adherence and Citation in text
6% of total result
ExcellentFewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors
6
SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors.
4.8
UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors.
3.6
UnacceptableThe citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format.
2.4
Spelling and Grammar
12% of total result
ExcellentFewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met.
12
SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count.
9.6
UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count.
7.2
UnacceptableAn unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count.