| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Study | 40 ptsExceeds ExpectationsIdentifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/problems in the case. Makes insightful, clear, and accurate connections to the key concepts of this week's content. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.24 ptsMeets ExpectationsIdentifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the main issues/problems in the case. Makes mostly accurate connections to this week's key concepts. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 16 ptsApproaches ExpectationsIdentifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case. Makes some accurate connections to this week's key concepts. Response indicates some understanding of the concepts presented in the case.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not demonstrate an acceptable understanding of the issues and problems in the case. Does not make connections to this week's key concepts. Response does not indicate understanding of the concepts presented in the case. | 40 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint | 15 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe presentation is engaging and interesting for the audience and demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness. Includes thorough details, relevant data, and information and is extremely well organized. Slide number requirements are met.9 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe presentation is moderately engaging and interesting for the audience and demonstrates some clarity, conciseness, and correctness. Includes details, relevant data, and information and is mostly well organized. Slide number requirements are met. 6 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe presentation is not very engaging or interesting. Demonstrates little clarity, conciseness, and/or correctness. Includes few details, relevant data, or information. Presentation is not well organized. Slide number requirements are not met.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe presentation is not engaging or interesting. Demonstrates no clarity, conciseness, and/or correctness. Fails to include details, relevant data, or information. Presentation is unorganized and confusing. Slide number requirements are not met. | 15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudio/Video Delivery | 10 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAudio: Smooth and fluid speech; few to no hesitations; no attempts to search for words; volume is excellent. Video: Demonstrates careful and complete planning, preparation, and practiced execution. The speaker maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around). The speaker does not rely on notes nor slides. Uses academic tone and language.6 ptsMeets ExpectationsAudio: Smooth and fluid speech; few hesitations; a slight search for words; inaudible word or two. Video: Demonstrates some planning, preparation, and practiced execution. The peaker generally maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around) with only a few lapses. The speaker sometimes relies on reading notes and/or slides. Mostly uses academic tone and language. 4 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAudio: Speech is relatively smooth with some hesitation and unevenness caused by rephrasing and searching for words; the volume wavers. Video: Demonstrates little planning, preparation, and practiced execution. The speaker indicates little preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. The speaker reads mostly from notes and/or is not prepared. There is sSome attempt at using academic tone and language.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsAudio: Speech is frequently hesitant with some sentences left uncompleted. The volume is very soft. Video: Demonstrates no planning, preparation, or practiced execution. The speaker indicates no preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. The speaker reads exclusively from notes and/or slides and is not prepared. Delivery is distracting and takes away from the content. There is little to no attempt at using academic tone and language. | 10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style Formatting (Note to ID: see full APA rubric to be used as needed.) | 5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.3 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. 2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources, citations, and references | 5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.3 ptsMeets ExpectationsMost sources are cited and reference correctly. Meets most of required sources for the assignment. 2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAt least one source is not cited properly, not reputable, or is inappropriate for the audience or topic.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not meet the required sources for the assignment. Sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or missing. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 75