OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Science · Studypool

Topic Outline

🚩 Originality Report Turnitin enabled🚩

I have to create an outline for a Decision-Making Process Paper that I will be submitting later in the class.

I have attached all the instructions. Please read all of them carefully

Select a Topic- include topic CATEGORY AND NUMBER AS YOUR TITLE

📱 Digital Health & Innovation( this is the category and below you can see the number)

  1. Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Alert Fatigue: Structuring APRN decision-making protocols to filter high-volume RPM telemetry data and reduce liability/alert fatigue while maintaining safety.

Please try to create this outline in the same way the professor did in the example she provided, but using my topic.

Rubric DetailMaximum Score

100 points

    Clarity of Topic Selection

    20% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    The topic is exceptionally clear, focused, and thoroughly aligned with nursing decision-making principles. Question is formatted correctly and understood.

    20

    Proficient Submission

    The topic is clear and relevant, with a good alignment to decision-making in nursing. There is lack of cohesion and development formulation of the topic question.

    15

    Satisfactory Submission

    The topic is somewhat clear but lacks focus or relevance to the decision-making theme. Topic is vague and lacks 'researchable.'

    10

    Needs Improvement Submission

    The topic is unclear or irrelevant, making it difficult to connect with decision-making in nursing.

    5

    Topic Listed is from approved list- number included as instructed

    5% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    Topic Listed is from approved list- number included as instructed - completed on first submission

    5

    Proficient Submission

    Assignment had to be resubmitted as student did not adhere to instructions and topic chosen was not on approved list for first submission

    0

    Satisfactory Submission

    0

    Needs Improvement Submission

    0

    Depth of Outline Development

    30% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    The outline is comprehensive, well-organized, and includes all necessary components to support a solid paper.

    30

    Proficient Submission

    The outline is detailed and organized, addressing most components required for building the paper.

    22.5

    Satisfactory Submission

    The outline includes basic elements but is lacking in detail or organization.

    15

    Needs Improvement Submission

    The outline is poorly organized and missing key components needed for a complete submission.

    7.5

    Relevance to Nursing Decision-Making

    25% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    The topic and outline demonstrate deep understanding of the nursing decision-making process and its impact.

    25

    Proficient Submission

    The topic and outline illustrate a solid understanding of the nursing decision-making process and its relevance.

    18.75

    Satisfactory Submission

    The topic's relevance to the nursing decision-making process is evident but lacks some clarity.

    12.5

    Needs Improvement Submission

    The topic and outline show limited relevance and understanding of nursing decision-making processes.

    6.25

    Adherence to Submission Guidelines

    10% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    Submission is flawless, following all guidelines for format and content without errors.

    10

    Proficient Submission

    Submission adheres mostly to guidelines, with minor errors that do not interfere with clarity.

    7.5

    Satisfactory Submission

    Submission follows some guidelines but contains several errors impacting readability.

    5

    Needs Improvement Submission

    Submission does not follow guidelines and contains multiple errors that significantly hinder clarity.

    2.5

    APA References

    5% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    5 EBP, scholarly peer-review sources listed on the reference page.

    5

    Proficient Submission

    4 EBP, scholarly peer-review sources listed on the reference page.

    3.75

    Satisfactory Submission

    3 EBP, scholarly peer-review sources listed on the reference page.

    2.5

    Needs Improvement Submission

    2 or less EBP, scholarly peer-review sources listed on the reference page.

    1.25

    APA adherence and Citation in text citations; Spelling and Grammar

    5% of total result

    Exemplary Submission

    Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. The paper is developed using APA-approved headings throughout the paper. Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met. Similarity index and AI index 20% or lower.

    5

    Proficient Submission

    More than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. The paper is developed using an introduction APA-approved heading- but no headings within the rest of the paper. More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index 25% or lower.

    3.75

    Satisfactory Submission

    More than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. APA formatting is not developed at the graduate level. More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index 30% or lower.

    2.5

    Needs Improvement Submission

    The citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format. An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index above 30%.