Overview
Case Analysis:
This assignment aims to critically analyze the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, examining its objectives, provisions, and consequences, especially in the context of the broader socio-political landscape. This will allow you to develop a comprehensive understanding of the policy, its implications, and its lasting impact on American society. History: " The most significant drug use surge occurred during the “crack epidemic” between 1984 and 1990 when the drug spread across American cities. The crack epidemic dramatically increased the number of Americans addicted to cocaine. In 1985, the number of people admitted to using cocaine routinely rose from 4.2 million to 5.8 million. This resulted in social consequences, such as increasing crime and violence in American inner cities and neighborhoods. Due to this situation, policymakers seek solutions for the ongoing opioid epidemic. In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed laws that created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity for the possession or trafficking of crack compared to penalties." Policy Selected: "Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986: Crack Epidemic: The 1980s in the U.S. was marked by a surge in drug use, mainly crack cocaine, predominantly affecting urban, often impoverished communities. Amidst growing public concern, the federal government intensified its efforts to combat this crisis. INSTRUCTIONS: As aspiring social workers, students must deeply contemplate this policy. Students should explain: 1. Purpose. 2. Objectives. 3. Stakeholders. 4. Positive and Negative consequences. 5. Social Impact. 6. Do you think that Intersectionality was ignored? Explain. 7. Compare the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 and the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) of 2016. 8.- Reflection on NASW - CSWE and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986.