Overview
I have worked on the results chapter, but I am not sure if what i have written makes sense academically and statistically. I need you to [please do the following:
1. Revize everything I have written with regard to the analysis of the numbers to see if everything makes sense, and compatible wth the tables.
2. insert the tables and plots in the document using APA style. and make sure that they are all consistent in the same size and font. Please note that for the descriptive statistics, only include in the table (mean, median, range, max, mi, SD)
3. In fact, I need the whole document to be formatted according to APA style. and I want everything to be consistent. For example, at some points I use syntactic type and it others I use syntactic-type, I want them all unified to syntactic type .and for the variables I want them inside these brackets //, so we have /for/, /of/. As for the conditions, I want them all unified as /S-grammatical/, /S-ungrammatical/, /P-grammatical/, /P-ungrammatical/ . As for proficiency, I have /elementary/, /intermediate/, and /advanced/. also, i want the document to be unified in terms of the way in reporting the numbers.
4. I generated my analysis of the tables using chatgpt for each section and I noticed that I am getting different ways for reporting the variables. for some for example the mean would be reported as number inside the text and for other sections, it would be reported like (M=33.0). Please make sure the whole documnet is consistent.
5. I am not sure about my arrangement of the chapter: I started by presenting the descriptive statistics, then the plots as a way of comparison, then the statistical test. This is my way but of course if you see there is a better way to do it, I'm all for it.
6. I think I need you to write some insights and interpretation for the differences and similarities between the two experiments for each dependent variable (first fixation duration, total fixation duration, and fixation counts) in the statistical section. I have aleady added some comments in the document regarding this.
7. As for skewness, I understand that this concept is highly crucial in my study, so I generated some interpretation from chatgpt related to the values that you have generated in the tables. I think it is better if you can read them and what you see relevant and necessay to your interpretation of the plots which I have already added to the attached document. If You do not agree with me and you think it is better if skewness is added to the table in the descriptive statistics, please add the analysis i got from chatgpt there.
8. Basically, I wish to have by the end of this task a neat and comprehensive Results chapter.
9. I would really appreciate it if you can by the end of this task highlighted the most important finsings that I should focus on in my discussion. If you have any question, please feel free to ask.