Overview
Please read the Hollenbeck and Wright (2017) article and provide a response (about 250 words; no more than one-double spaced page) to the following prompt:
Hollenbeck and Wright argue that “Tharking can promote the effectiveness and efficiency of both scientific inquiry and cumulative knowledge creation.” They make a claim that the practice of Tharking is “beneficial to scientific progress and, in many cases, ethically required.” What are some counterarguments to Hollenbeck and Wright's claim, particularly as related to your field of study?
Feel free to read through some of your colleagues’ posts that will be visible after you’ve submitted you post. You are not required to respond to your colleagues’ posts.