Overview
Use your previous Project submission from Weeks 1, 2, and 4 and add the following:
Conclusion:
- Restate the findings and conclusions of your research. Be sure to reference the situation as you discuss your conclusion.
- To what population do you feel comfortable extrapolating your results? Why?
- Discuss the weaknesses of your study. Include any areas of caution that a reader or user of your work would be aware of as they make decisions. Was the sample random, was the sample large enough, etc.?
- Give suggestions for further work in the area of your topic.
Upload your assignment following the submission instructions found below
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRestatement of Findings and Conclusions | 25 ptsExemplaryClearly and accurately summarizes findings from Weeks 1–4; integrates statistical results (e.g., descriptive stats, confidence intervals, hypothesis test); conclusion logically follows from data.20 ptsProficientSummarizes most key findings accurately; conclusion generally supported by data with minor inconsistencies. 15 ptsDevelopingFindings partially summarized; weak or unclear connection between data and conclusion.0 ptsIncompleteFindings missing, inaccurate, or unrelated to the project data. | 25 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExtrapolation to Population | 20 ptsExemplaryThoughtfully discusses appropriate population for inference; provides sound reasoning based on sampling method and data limitations.18 ptsProficientIdentifies target population with reasonable justification; some minor oversights in reasoning. 16 ptsDevelopingMentions population but provides weak or unclear rationale for extrapolation.0 ptsIncompleteNo discussion of population or reasoning; inaccurate or unsupported claim. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of Study Weaknesses | 20 ptsExemplaryThoroughly identifies multiple limitations (e.g., sample size, bias, randomness, measurement error) and discusses how they affect reliability of results.18 ptsProficientIdentifies relevant weaknesses with general discussion of their impact. 16 ptsDevelopingMentions one or two weaknesses superficially or without explanation.0 ptsIncompleteNo discussion of weaknesses or demonstrates misunderstanding of study design issues. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSuggestions for Further Work | 20 ptsExemplaryProvides thoughtful, specific suggestions for future research.18 ptsProficientOffers reasonable suggestions for future work 16 ptsDevelopingLimited or vague suggestions0 ptsIncompleteNo suggestions for future research or irrelevant discussion. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizatin, Clarity, and Mechanics | 15 ptsExemplaryWell-organized, polished presentation; clear writing, appropriate terminology, and no grammatical or formatting errors.13 ptsProficientMostly clear and organized; few errors that do not hinder readability. 12 ptsDevelopingSome organizational or grammatical issues; flow of ideas somewhat confusing.0 ptsIncompleteDisorganized, incomplete, or difficult to follow; numerous writing errors. | 15 pts |
Total Points: 100