Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

Due Oct 20 by 11:59pm Points 25 Submitting a file upload Available until Oct 25 at 11:59pm

Submit Assignment

Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

Paper Guidelines: Evaluation of Health Information Resources on the Internet

Before you begin writing the paper, you need to identify an Internet resource (e.g., website) that provides health information for patients and families. This Internet resource can be in your area of practice or interest. Select a website or a set of pages from a website, rather than just one webpage. To locate and select a website: Try using the Google search engine and search for “patient education about [fill in your topic of interest]” or “[topic of interest] patient education.” For example, if your topic of interest is diabetes, you would Google “patient education about diabetes” or “diabetes patient education.”

Do not select a website that is intended for health professionals only—your paper will not be accepted if the website is not intended for patients and families.

If you are using a website that addresses MANY topics or health conditions (e.g. WebMD or American Heart Association), please select one or two focal areas or conditions to focus on when you evaluate “Information Quality,”

Write a paper (minimum 7 pages/maximum 10 pages, not including the cover or reference pages) using the following steps and outline below.

Step 1 Introduction. Be sure to include support from the literature.

Define health literacy. Discuss the importance of health literacy in patient/family management of health and disease and promotion of positive health outcome Discuss the nurse’s role in promoting health literacy. Why must nurses and other health professionals know how to evaluate health-related websites?

Step 2. Health-related Internet Resource. Identify a health-related Internet resource (i.e., website) and explain how and why you selected the resource. Describe your selected resource that can be used to promote patients’ and families’ knowledge about a disease or health condition.

Identify the home page of the website by URL. Describe the reasons for your website selection. Describe the website. Consider such elements as graphics, page layout, navigation menu and ease of navigation, font size (ease of reading), e

Step 3. Evaluation

Provide an evaluation of the website using the four specific categories and criteria described in National (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/webeval/webeval.html) Library of Medicine (NLM) (https://panthers-

9/10/2019 Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

https://uwmil.instructure.com/courses/216065/assignments/758221?module_item_id=2285320 2/5

my.sharepoint.com/personal/oh5_uwm_edu/Documents/academy/2019%20Fall/Library%20of%20Medicine%20(NLM)) (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/webeval/webeval.html (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/webeval/webeval.html) ). And cite the NLM to the paper to support rationale for recommendations.

Be sure to give specific examples for each criterion and include enough information to allow the reader to locate the examples provided. For example, if you are discussing “Provider and Purpose” and the criterion regarding ability to contact the site, you should indicate if you found contact information (email, address, phone number) and where on the site you found this information.

Your focus in this section should be on comparing the website with the NLM criteria and providing factual data from which you can make judgments about the quality of the website. The information you provide in this section should be based on the NLM criteria and should be factual not opinion.

These are the four categories included in the NLM tutorial. To identify the specific criteria to use in evaluating each category, you will need to complete the NLM tutorial. It is highly recommended that you take notes as you complete the tutorial.

Provider and purpose Funding Information quality Privacy

Step 4. Summary

Summarize your descriptions and evaluations as well as consider the concept of health literacy.

Strengths, Limitations, and Implications Based on Evaluation Synthesize the strengths and limitations of the website based on the evaluation and in relation to its use by patients and families. Include your perspective regarding the implications (i.e., potential areas of concern, unintended consequences) of using this website for patient education. This may include issues related to accessibility, literacy level, need for accommodations (related to language, cognitive and/or physical limitations), and patient/family use of the website in unintended ways. Unintended consequences do not always have to be negative, there can be positive findings as well.

Recommendations for Improvement Discuss recommendations and rationale for improvement of the website based on strengths, limitations, and implications. Provide at least two specific examples for improvement of the website based on the evaluation.

You must organize your paper using the headings identified below. Please see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/16/ (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/16/) for information about APA headings.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Paper 1: Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper