Picot Statement Paper Project
Picot Statement Paper Project
Review the Topic Materials and the work completed in NRS-433V to formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project. Picot Statement Paper Project
A PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent, specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require a provider prescription. Include a comparison to a patient population not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process. Picot Statement Paper Project
Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format provided in the assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project. Picot Statement Paper Project
In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.
Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement:
- Evidence-Based Solution
- Nursing Intervention
- Patient Care
- Health Care Agency
- Nursing Practice
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Picot Statement Paper Project
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
NRS-433VN-RS1 Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words):
Hand hygiene is an important practice in any health institution as it not only maintains the health and safety of the patient but also that of the health professional. However, most health professionals do not adhere to hand hygiene practices or do not effectively carry out the practices. This negligence has led to a high prevalence of Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs) and consequently an increase in morbidity and mortality rates. The World Health Organization has a set of guidelines that dictate proper and effective hand hygiene practices before and after contact with the patient. There are different factors that contribute to this noncompliance of the guidelines. Despite the presence of these influencing factors, studies show that health workers have knowledge on the importance of hand hygiene, yet they choose not to practice these techniques.
Other factors include influence from their peers in cases where they opt for methods like putting on gloves instead of hand washing, behavioral motivational factors and work environment factors such as high population of patients or scarce resources. These factors are common in most studies done in different regions across the world. This is an indication that there is need for extra and constant education on the importance of hand hygiene and motivation to the adherence of hand hygiene practices. Picot Statement Paper Project
PICOT Question: For patients and healthcare workers in the hospital (p) does hand washing protocol (I) compared to an alcohol-based solution (C) reduce hospital acquired infection (O) within a period of stay in the hospital (T). Picot Statement Paper Project
| Criteria |
Article 1 QUANTITATIVE study |
Article 2
|
Article 3
|
| APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink | Deochand, N., & Deochand, M. E. (2016). Brief Report on Hand-Hygiene Monitoring Systems: A Pilot Study of a Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique. Journal of environmental health, 78(10). |
Chatfield, S. L., Nolan, R., Crawford, H., & Hallam, J. S. (2016). Experiences of hand hygiene among acute care nurses: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. SAGE open medicine, 4, 2050312116675098.
|
Dyson, J., Lawton, R., Jackson, C., & Cheater, F. (2013). Development of a theory-based instrument to identify barriers and levers to best hand hygiene practice among healthcare practitioners. Implementation Science, 8(1), 111.
|
| How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? | The article explains the results of a hand hygiene technique; Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique | The article elaborates the effect of the nurses’ perceptions of hygiene is critical in driving practices. Improvements of hand hygiene can reduce the incidences of healthcare-related infections amongst patients. | The article develops an instrument to assess impediments and boosters to HH and ways of adapting theory to practice in HH. |
| Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) | The study is qualitative using data collected the image analysis | The research employs a qualitative approach using data from eight nurses in different health facilities. | Qualitative. The assessment involved the use of collected data to assess the barriers and levers to HH |
| Purpose Statement | This new study wanted to find better hand hygiene techniques that were cost effective, less intrusive and more accurate. | The study wanted to investigate whether it is possible to cultivate a culture of hygiene among health care practitioners through consistent reminders for the need to observe one’s attitude to hand washing. | To assess and identify barriers and levers to Hand Hygiene and develop a theory-based diagnosis instrument for HH. |
| Research Question | Brief Report on Hand-Hygiene Monitoring Systems: A Pilot Study of a Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique | How do nurses perceive the significance of their hand washing practices on their patients? | What are the main barrier and levers to Hand Hygiene? |
| Outcome | Computer Assisted Image analysis is more effective compared to traditional techniques like observation. | The nurses perceive their health practices are perceived differently by the hospitals. | The greater the number of impediments to hand hygiene, the lower the adherence to HH strategies by staff. |
|
Setting (Where did the study take place?) |
Western Michigan University | Various hospitals throughout the U.S. | Delphi |
| Sample | 2 | Eight nurses in the U.S.A. | A total of 100 medical professionals were asked to assess the top barriers and levers to HH. |
| Method | Quantitative | Qualitative analysis | Medical professionals were engaged to carry out an assessment of the main barriers and levers to HH. |
| Key Findings of the Study |
5seconds was effective in removing glow germs. Less glow germs were present in subject who used soap in hand washing |
Policy-mandated rules and personal hygiene contribute to hand cleanliness among nurses. Picot Statement Paper Project | As the number of findings become few, the rate of compliance to HH increases and as the number of barriers to HH decreases the level of compliance increases. |
| Recommendations of the Researcher | Hand image analysis provides effective feedback on hand hygiene and can be used to improve on hand hygiene techniques. | Nurses should be involved in strategizing on the best hand washing plans and strategies to ensure effective results. | There is a need to eradicate or reduce the barrier to HH and increase the levers if full HH is to be realized. |
References
Anna, G. P & Sobala, W. (2013). Observance of hand washing procedures performed by the medical personnel before patient contact part 1 Retrieved from international journal of occupational medicine and environmental health 2013
Deochand, N., & Deochand, M. E. (2016). Brief Report on Hand-Hygiene Monitoring Systems: A Pilot Study of a Computer-Assisted Image Analysis Technique. Journal of environmental health, 78(10).
Chatfield, S. L., Nolan, R., Crawford, H., & Hallam, J. S. (2016). Experiences of hand hygiene among acute care nurses: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. SAGE open medicine, 4, 2050312116675098.
Sendall, M. C., McCosker, L. K., & Halton, K. (2019). Cleaning Staff’s Attitudes about Hand Hygiene in a Metropolitan Hospital in Australia: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 1067.
Sung-Ching, P., Tien, K. L., Hung, I., Yu-Jiun, L., Wang-Huei, S., Wang, M. J., & Yee-Chun, C. (2013). Compliance of Health Care Workers with Hand Hygiene Practices: Independent Advantages of Overt and Covert Observers. PLoS One, 8(1), e53746.
Dyson, J., Lawton, R., Jackson, C., & Cheater, F. (2013). Development of a theory-based instrument to identify barriers and levers to best hand hygiene practice among healthcare practitioners. Implementation Science, 8(1), 111.
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| NRS-490 | NRS-490-O500 | PICOT Statement Paper | 75.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (89.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 80.0% | |||||||
| Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue | 30.0% | Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed. Picot Statement Paper Project | Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome. | Clinical problem/issue is identified but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal improvement. | Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be improved using nursing interventions. | Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention. | ||
| Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based Solution, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice | 30.0% | Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity and the corresponding elements are not included. | Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. | Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue. Picot Statement Paper Project | Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical problem/issue resolution. | Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution. | ||
| PICOT Statement Focused on Resolution, Improvement, Application, and Intervention | 10.0% | PICOT statement does not focus on resolution of a problem/issue, improvement of patient care or application of a nursing intervention. | PICOT statement discusses a clinical problem/issue without a focus on improvement or intervention. | PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue that improves patient care through the application of a nursing intervention. | PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue, with discussion of improving patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention. | PICOT statement clearly focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue and aims at improving patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention. | ||
| PICOT Statement Including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time | 10.0% | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are not included. | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present. | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are clearly provided and well developed. | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 15.0% | |||||||
| Presentation | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Picot Statement Paper Project | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Format | 5.0% | |||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 2.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 3.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – Picot Statement Paper Project
Who we are
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication. Picot Statement Paper ProjectIs it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Picot Statement Paper Project
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. Picot Statement Paper Project
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Picot Statement Paper Project
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Picot Statement Paper Project
- Guarantee
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Picot Statement Paper Project
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?
We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,
Timely Delivery
Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.
Highly skilled writers
We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers