Boost your Grades with us today! Get your 15% Discount Now!
HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment
Assignment title: Reflection Purpose:
This assessment task will enable you to reflect on the Internation Council of Nurse (ICN) Code of Ethics in preparation for your transition from student to Graduate Registered Nurse. The focus for this assessment is on ULO3 (Appraise professional requirements in preparation for the transition to the role of the registered nurse).
Submission requirements
Due date and time: 8pm AEST Friday 19th October 2024.
TimeZone converter: <link>
% of final grade: 10% of overall grade
Word limit: 500 words (550 maximum)
Submission location: via HNN320 CloudDeakin dropbox
Assignment format: PDF
PDF conversion software is available here on Deakin Software Catalogue
Referencing: APA 7
Assignment Task Description:
You are required to review the ICN Code of Ethics (2021 revision), and to identify an element, or criteria within an element, where you would like your clinical performance to improve.
The What, So What, Now What Reflection Model is easily applied to many contexts and will be utilised in this assignment to assist you to reflect on how you will improve your clinical practice within the identified element.
Writing style: As this is a reflective piece, this assignment is to be written in first person, using suitable language for an academic assessment. You may use the headings provided in Step 2 to structure your reflection. No Introduction or conclusion is required.
Assignment instructions:
Step 1: Identifying the ICN element you would like to improve your clinical performance in
Review the ICN Code of Ethics and reflect on your performance in each element, and criteria within the code. Although it is not a requirement, you may find reviewing recently completed clinical assessment tools and comments provided by clinical educators useful when reflecting on your clinical performance.
Consider honestly, the level that you are currently achieving in each element and identify one element (or criteria within an element) for you to reflect on more deeply in this assignment. This will be an area of clinical practice that you identify as one you would like to improve your performance in prior to graduating as a Registered Nurse.
Step 2: The reflection
Using the What, So What, Now What Reflection Model, reflect on your clinical performance related to the ICN Code of Ethics element identified in step 1. Reflection is a crucial activity throughout your career and having feedback on your current reflection skills will assist in developing your reflection skills further as you transition into your graduate year as a Registered Nurse/Midwife. The following headings have been provided to guide your reflection:
What: Describe the clinical scenario or experience you have chosen for reflection. Provide relevant context, including patient demographics, clinical setting, and background information, AND identify one specific ICN Code of Ethics element (or criteria within an element) relevant to this scenario.
So What: Consider how your practice in this situation aligned (or did not align) with the ICN Code of Ethics element chosen. Analyse and critically evaluate the effectiveness of your practice and identify any areas for improvement. Does the literature give any insight for you to link to?
Now What: Based on your reflection, propose one (1) strategy to enhance your skills, knowledge, and competencies to meet the ICN Code of Ethics element more effectively. You may find that reading and referring to current literature here will assist you to identify suitable strategies.
Presentation requirements:
The School of Nursing and Midwifery follows the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th edition referencing style. Presentation requirements of this referencing style are outlined below. For further detail regarding APA 7 referencing style refer to Referencing | Students (deakin.edu.au).
Font: Arial or Calibri, 11 point.
Spacing: 1.5 line spacing
Page numbers: Top right corner
Margins: 2.5cm on all four margins
Paragraph indents: First line of each paragraph (using the tab key or paragraph tool).
Justification: Left
Word limit: Maximum word limit allowed is ± 10% (reference list not counted)
Technical support
If you encounter technical issues while completing your assessment, please lodge a support ticket through the IT Service Desk online or contact the Service Desk via phone:
HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2 Access Plan
If you are a student experiencing a disability, health condition or mental health condition that affects your study, or your participation in university life, contact the Disability Resource Centre for assistance and to arrange an Access Plan. An Access Plan is a study support plan prepared to minimise the educational disadvantage you may experience as a result of your disability or condition.
Extensions and Special Consideration:
Refer to the Unit Guide for information about:
- Extension to Submission Dates
- Late Submission of Assessment Tasks
- Special Consideration
Your responsibility to complete your assignments with academic integrity
Breaching academic integrity in your assessments is cheating and is not accepted at Deakin. For example, you should not take someone else’s work or ideas and pass them off as your own. If your work contains material copied from a classmate or an external source, your work will be referred to the Faculty Academic Integrity Committee. If you are found guilty of an academic integrity breach, possible penalties include a zero mark for the assessment task, zero marks for the unit, or expulsion from your course.
Please read more information on academic integrity by clicking on this link:
https://www.deakin.edu.au/students/studying/academic-integrity
Rubric: Please see rubric at the end of this document Assignment resources and support: HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
Discussion: If you have additional questions to answered in the FAQ, feel free to ask on the discussion board
We encourage you to be proactive and problem-solving to develop your skills in lifelong learning, with the following suggestions:
- Read the Unit Guide and all assignment information before posting a question
- Explain in your post what you have already done to try to find the information or solve the problem
- To avoid duplication, read previous posts before posting a new question as it may already have been answered
- Answer other students’ posts when you can!
In class and CloudDeakin resources:
In order to assist you in completing this assessment task a number of exercises and resources will be provided in seminar and on CloudDeakin:
- Seminar Activity: A seminar activity to support your learning will be conducted in week
- Cloud Resources: A variety of cloud resources to support your learning are provided in the week 1, week 2, and week 3 cloud pages.
Deakin resources:
Study
Uni start
Skills for study Academic Skills Active reading Making digital notes
Time management
Study workload planner Assignment planner
Assessment
Critical reflection
Drafting and proofreading
Referencing and academic integrity Academic integrity
Using generative artificial intelligence Acknowledging the use of generative AI Referencing Guide: APA7
Literature search and evaluation
Search tips and planning Annotated bibliography Evaluating information Misinformation
Library Resource guides
Library resource guides for Health
Criterion mode: Points |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
||||||
Starting % |
80 |
Starting % |
70 |
Starting % |
60 |
Starting % |
50 |
Starting % |
0 |
||
Criterion 1
What: Describe the clinical scenario or experience you have chosen for reflection and identify one specific ICN Code of Ethics element relevant to this scenario. |
Logically and comprehensively describes the clinical scenario, including relevant contextual information of that experience. Comprehensively relates one specific ICN Code of Ethics element to the scenario. |
Provides a detailed description of the clinical scenario and relates one specific ICN Code of Ethics element to the scenario in depth. |
Provides a description of the clinical scenario and identifies an ICN Code of Ethics element that is relevant to the scenario. |
Identifies a clinical situation and provides general discussion regarding the ICN Code of Ethics element. |
Limited or unclear discussion of a clinical situation AND/OR Limited or unclear discussion regarding ICN Code of Ethics element. |
||||||
Points |
20 |
16- 20 points |
14- 15 points |
12- 13 points |
10- 11 points |
0-9 points |
|||||
Criterion 2 So What: Analyse how your practice in this situation aligned with the ICN Code of Ethics element. Critically evaluate the effectiveness of your practice and identify any areas for improvement. |
Logically and comprehensively analyses nursing practice within the scenario, and critically evaluates self-practice as it relates to the identified ICN Code of Ethics element. |
Provides a detailed analysis of nursing practice within the scenario, and evaluates self- practice as it relates to the identified ICN Code of Ethics element |
Provides an analysis of nursing practice within the scenario, and demonstrates a beginning ability to evaluate self-practice as it relates to the identified ICN Code of Ethics element |
Attempts to analyse nursing practice within the scenario with minimal evidence of ability to evaluate self-practice as it relates to the identified ICN Code of Ethics element |
Limited or unclear analysis and/or evaluation between the scenario and the ICN Code of Ethics element |
||||||
Points |
40 |
32- 40 points |
28- 31 points |
24- 27 points |
20- 23 points |
0-19 points |
|||||
Criterion 3
Now What: Based on your reflection, propose one (1) strategy to enhance your skills, knowledge, and competencies to meet the ICN Code of Ethics element more effectively. |
Presents one or more logical and relevant strategies for professional development. Strategy comprehensively integrates insights gained from reflection with the ICN Code of Ethics element. |
Presents one detailed and relevant strategy for professional development. Strategy integrates some insight gained from reflection with the selected ICN Code of Ethics element. |
Presents one relevant strategy for professional development. Strategy is appropriate and somewhat linked back to the selected ICN Code of Ethics element. |
Presents one general strategy for professional development that may relate to one of the ICN Code of Ethics element. |
General strategy is not provided and/or not relevant. AND/OR No links of strategy back to the ICN Code of Ethics element. |
||||||
Points |
30 |
24- 30 points |
21- 23 points |
18- 20 points |
15- 17 points |
0-14 points |
|||||
HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
Criterion 4 Presentation, writing and referencing in accordance with assessment instructions |
Writing is consistently clear, succinct and logically structured.
Well-presented and follows all formatting and word count requirements.
Adheres to APA referencing style with an occasional minor error where references used. |
Writing is consistently clear and mostly logically structured.
Mostly well-presented and follows all formatting and word count requirements.
Adheres to APA referencing style with several minor errors in text or reference list where references used. |
Writing is consistently clear and mostly logically structured.
Mostly well-presented and follows all formatting and word count requirements.
Adheres to APA referencing style with several minor errors in text or reference list where references used. |
Writing is mostly clear.
Follows some formatting requirements.
Adheres to APA referencing style but has more than one significant gap or error in text or reference list where references used. |
Writing is unclear with consistent errors in grammar, structure or expression.
Poorly presented and does not adhere to formatting requirements.
Does not adhere to APA referencing style if references used. |
|
Points |
10 |
8-10 points |
7 points |
6 points |
5 points |
0-4 points |
Total Points |
100 |
|
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
Who we are
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
- Guarantee
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. HNN320 Quality and Safety in Health Care 2 Assessment Task 2
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper