Analyzing Bias in Media: Assessing Content and Funding Sources

Introduction:

When evaluating media sources, it is crucial to examine the use of visuals, language, and funding sources to identify potential biases. In this analysis, we will explore the article “Exercise Advice for Surviving Cancer, and Maybe Avoiding It” from The New York Times. 

We will discuss examples of neutral and subjective content, assess language neutrality, examine potential biases, evaluate the effects on readers, identify instances of subjective language or visuals that may create bias or sensationalism, compare the examples to yellow journalism or fake news, and consider the funding sources and their potential influence on news content. COM 4100 Unit 2 Evaluating Bias in Media

1. Analyzing Content:

The article suggests that working out can help fight cancer, which is a subjective claim. This statement represents someone’s personal opinion, research, and feelings, and it is uncertain if it applies universally. To provide more objective content, additional studies, and diverse perspectives would be necessary to establish a solid foundation of evidence.

2. Language Neutrality:

The language in the article appears to strive for neutrality. It avoids focusing on specific individuals or genders. The title, “Exercise Advice for Surviving Cancer,” contributes to neutrality by not specifying any particular group. 

Furthermore, the accompanying visuals depict individuals of different races and both genders, emphasizing inclusivity and neutrality. The intention is to address a broad audience of cancer patients who could benefit from the advice provided. COM 4100 Unit 2 Evaluating Bias in Media

3. Clear Bias:

The article may exhibit bias against cancer treatments. It highlights how various treatments can make patients feel worse while exercising can significantly improve their well-being. This bias may arise from a preference for alternative or complementary therapies. It is essential for readers to critically evaluate such claims and consider evidence-based medical treatments alongside alternative options.

4. Effects on Readers:

The subjective content suggesting that exercise can help avoid cancer can impact readers in various ways. Those with family or friends battling cancer may pass on the advice to them. Readers who come across this subjective content may feel compelled to help others by sharing the potential benefits of exercise in cancer prevention. Although it is just advice, it encourages individuals to consider incorporating exercise into their lives to support overall health. 

5. Subjective Language and Sensationalism:

The article includes a subjective statement: “Exercise seems to be especially potent at lessening the likelihood of developing seven common malignancies.” This content leans towards sensationalism as it could generate excitement among readers. COM 4100 Unit 2 Evaluating Bias in Media

The idea that exercise can help prevent multiple types of cancer may inspire individuals to explore exercise as a preventive measure. However, readers should critically assess such claims, considering the broader context of scientific research.

6. Comparisons to Yellow Journalism and Fake News:

The examples chosen share similarities with yellow journalism and fake news in terms of providing advice and information on avoiding cancer and managing treatment-related challenges. However, it is important to note that this article does not exhibit any clear signs of yellow journalism or fake news. Instead, it focuses on presenting opinions and research findings related to cancer advice.

7. Funding Sources:

The website or printed paper includes several advertisements that may serve as funding sources. These ads include the promotion of Dodge Ram’s new 2019 Ram 1500 Truck, an ad for the movie Terminator Dark Faith, an advertisement for Lancôme skincare products, and a sign-up ad for NYT Parenting, a platform providing guidance to parents. 

While it is unclear if these advertisements influenced the news content, it is worth noting that financial support from specific advertisers could potentially create conflicts of interest and influence news content. It is essential for readers to be aware that news content can be manipulated, although no direct connections can be inferred in this instance. COM 4100 Unit 2 Evaluating Bias in Media

Conclusion:

In evaluating bias in media, it is crucial to analyze the use of visuals, language, and funding sources. By examining the presence of neutral and subjective content, assessing language neutrality, identifying potential biases, considering the effects on readers, recognizing instances of subjective language or visuals, comparing examples to yellow journalism or fake news, and exploring funding sources, readers can make informed judgments and develop a well-rounded perspective on the presented information.

Reference

Exercise Advice for Surviving Cancer, and Maybe Avoiding It by Gretchen Reynolds found on 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/16/well/move/exercise-advice-for-surviving-cancer-and-maybe-avoiding-it.html

Moulding and Manipulating the News by Sharon Beder found on

https://documents.uow.edu.au/~/sharonb/mediachap.html

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – COM 4100 Unit 2 Evaluating Bias in Media

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. COM 4100 Unit 2 Evaluating Bias in Media

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper