Week 5 Discussion Assignment

Week 5 Discussion Assignment

Week 5 Discussion Assignment

Week 5_ Discussion

Discussion Description: For this discussion, you will continue to use the Keiser University Online Library to find and read peer-reviewed journal articles focusing on a topic of your interest. You will continue to synthesize the information you discover in peer-reviewed research articles.

Review the following presentation:
How to Synthesize Articles for a Paper.pptx How to Synthesize Articles for a Paper.pptx – Alternative Formats

Discussion Instructions:

1. Use the Keiser University Online Library to find a minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles (including articles found during previous weeks IF they apply to the student’s topic). All articles must be from Psychology Journals and address a psychological construct (i.e., topic).
2. For the initial discussion post, design an outline that will be used to create the Literature Review required as part of the Week 5-7 project. Use the following template when posting an outline for your initial discussion.
3. Improve the outline during the week with the help of other students and the Professor. Once completed, cut/paste the outline information and submit it as part of your Week 5 assignment, along with your annotated bibliography.
4. Attach the articles to your initial discussion post.

When responding to other students this week, help each other develop a precise topic for the Week 5-7 project. Provide specific feedback including examples. The following template can be used this week to create the initial discussion post.

NOTE: as always for every discussion and assignment, students must properly cite resources in-text and in a “References” list.

You must provide the initial post by Wednesday, at least one response to a student by Friday, and at least one additional response to a student by Sunday (total three posts minimum).

References

Frye, A (n.d.). How to synthesize articles for a paper [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://www.uml.edu/

To make a post, click the title Week 5 Discussion above, select the thread, click Reply and make your post.

DISCUSSION OUTLINE TEMPLATE (after revisions, cut and paste the final outline and submit as part of the Week 5 assignment):

Hello Class,

Introduction (do not actually create a section heading called Introduction as that is assumed): provide a short paragraph introducing the reader to the main topic and the key concepts that will be addressed in the literature review assignment (Weeks 5-7).

Theme One (create a new section heading based on your topic theme): describe in 2-3 words the first main topic of your literature review. Next, briefly (4-5 sentences) describe the information you will discuss in your Literature Review paper and cite articles that will support your discussion.5

EXAMPLE: imagine a student’s topic is “Writing a Literature Review Strategies for Psychology Graduate Students”. The first section might be “Annotated Bibliography and Outline” because that is the main theme found in the literature (DO NOT USE THIS THEME FOR YOUR PAPER). The section description could describe how this section will define and explain the concepts (Smith, 2001; Mohammed, 2015). The section description could also include, for example, how Section One will address how an outline and an annotated bibliography is created and formatted (Chang, 2017; Rodriguez, 2014; Conner, 2000).

Theme Two (create a new section heading based on your topic theme): describe in 2-3 words the second main topic of your literature review. Next, briefly (4-5 sentences) describe the information you will discuss in your Literature Review paper and cite articles that will support your discussion.

Theme Three if you find one

Conclusion (a discussion and/or Conclusion section is an appropriate section heading): summarize the discussion and add comments addressing how the outline and subsequent literature review can still be improved. Perhaps even ask for help by addressing specific questions or concerns. For example, students might state “one of the challenges with this outline is there appears to be limited research on the topic of creating an annotated bibliography”. This comment could help other students and the Professor provide the student with useful feedback.

References (centered on new page)

list all references included in the outline

Readings

• Bregman, H. R., Malik, N. M., Page, M. J., Makynen, E., & Lindahl, K. M. (2013). Identity profiles in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: The role of family influences. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(3), 417–430.
  Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
• Collier, K. L., van Beusekom, G., Bos, H. W., & Sandfort, T. M. (2013). Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression-related peer victimization in adolescence: A systematic review of associated psychosocial and health outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3/4), 299–317.
  Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
• Pachankis, J. E., & Goldfield, M. R. (2004). Clinical issues in working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 41(3), 227–246.
  Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
• Ryan, C. (2010). Engaging families to support lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: The family acceptance project. Prevention Researcher, 17(4), 11–13.
  Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
• Saewyc, E. M. (2011). Research on adolescent sexual orientation: Development, health disparities, stigma, and resilience. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 256–272.
  Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Media

• Laureate Education (Producer.) (2014c). Coming out stories [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

  Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 42 minutes.

  Please use some of the resources listed above.

• Promoting Well-Being in LGBT Youth

To help prepare for this Discussion, read the following scenario:

Seamus, a 13-year-old boy, walks into your office and for the first time reveals that he is gay. Seamus asks you for help with “coming out” to his parents.

• Think about what considerations (e.g., intended and unintended consequences of his decision) you would want him to take into account before he approaches his family and others.
• Think about what you should do to prepare to speak with Seamus about his concerns. What might you suggest to Seamus?
• Consider any concerns that Seamus may have.
• Think about possible suggestions you might have for Seamus in approaching is family, if any.
• Identify possible consequences of his decision.
• Consider strategies you might share to reduce Seamus’ risk or bolster his resilience

Post by Day 3:

Explain at least two important factors that you would consider when preparing to talk with Seamus about his concerns. Then explain at least one factor Seamus should consider before approaching his family. Finally, explain at least one strategy to reduce risk or to bolster Seamus’ resilience in the face of possible negative consequences with his family.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS –

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Week 5 Discussion Assignment

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. Week 5 Discussion Assignment

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Week 5 Discussion Assignment

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.  Week 5 Discussion Assignment

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Week 5 Discussion Assignment

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper