Overview
Higginbotham & Andersen articles one and four discussion board--due January 21 @ 9 am
REMEMBER, THE USE OF ChatGPT, BARD, OR OTHER FORMS OF AI IS DEFINED AS A FORM OF CHEATING. POINTS WILL BE DEDUCTED FOR THE INCLUSION OF OUTSIDE REFERENCES. THE RESOURCES YOU NEED TO COMPLETE ASSIGNMENTS ARE PROVIDED ON THE COURSE SITE.
Higginbotham and Andersen, Readings One and Four Discussion Board:
Please respond to the following in paragraph form, providing an appropriate level of detail and specificity. Single sentence replies are insufficient! Spelling, grammar, and punctuation count. Proofread your work prior to posting. Responses should be a minimum of two well-developed paragraphs for each question.
Reading one:
- As the author notes (p.7), “Clear-cut definitions of race are surprisingly elusive.” Identify the various definitions raised in the article. If race were simply a “fixed, biological category” would there not be consensus (agreement) as to the definition of race? If race were simply a “fixed, biological category” would it not be easy and clear-cut to assign individuals to their “natural” race? However, as noted, consensus is lacking, and it is not easy to assign individuals to their “natural” race. What does this imply? Be specific and detailed.
Reading four:
- The authors document the involvement of states and courts in defining race and assigning individuals to racial categories. Why does it matter which racial category an individual is assigned to? Be specific and detailed.
Please label and number your responses but submit them as a single discussion board post.